Last Updated on April 22, 2020 by Legalseva.net
Here in this post, we bring judgment digest from the most recent judgment of Punjab Haryana High Court Chandigarh where the prayer was made for Annulment of Marriage dismissed by Family Court and now petitioner has preferred FAO (First Appeal against Order) under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act seeking declaration that his marriage with respondent be declared nullity.
Let’s have the judgment digest straightaway.
Also Read- Chandigarh Panchkula Mohali Divorce Free Legal Advice
TOPIC: Annulment of Marriage
NAME OF COURT: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAME OF PARTIES:
Jaswinder Singh …..Appellant
Vs.
Manjit Kaur …..Respondent
CASE NUMBER: FAO 2709 of 2015 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 21 May, 2018
FACTS OF CASE:
The facts pleaded by the appellant-husband in his petition are that his marriage with respondent was solemnized on December 12, 1997 according to Sikh rites and according to HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. The appellant and respondent cohabited 1 of 20 FAO 2709 of 2015 (O&M) [2] together as husband and wife and one male child Darshdeep was born out of said wedlock on July 6, 1999. The appellant levelled allegations of maltreatment and cruelty against the respondent. During the period of 14 years of marriage, they had lived together for a period of six months under one roof and for the last more than 10 years they had been residing separately in separate rooms in the house of the appellant.
Also Read- Looking for Best Divorce Lawyer in Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali, Zirakpur
The allegations have been levelled against the respondent for not performing the matrimonial duties and causing mental and physical cruelty. It has been averred in the petition that respondent had deserted the appellant in the same house. An allegation has been levelled that respondent was already married at the time of marriage with the present appellant, with one Ravinder Singh on March 4, 1992, at Chandigarh but she did not disclose the said fact to the appellant regarding her earlier marriage. It is further averred in the petition that respondent had played a fraud with the appellant as she was already married with Ravinder Singh which fact was not disclosed to the appellant as well as to his parents. It was informed that respondent was youngest daughter of her parents whereas the respondent was having a younger sister who was also married.
It was further averred that respondent had obtained divorce from her earlier husband on January 29, 1998 after the solemnization of marriage with the appellant, by the Court of Sh.Amar Dutt, the then District Judge, Chandigarh, in case “ManjitKaur Vs. Ravinder Singh @ Lalli”, as such there was concealment of fact by the respondent regarding her earlier marriage which has caused mental torture to the appellant as well as his family members as such decree for annulment of marriage was prayed for.
Also Read- Send Legal Notice for a Divorce
The respondent contested the petition for nullity claiming that son of the parties was studying in 10th class and the respondent was also residing in the same house. The petition was a counter-blast to an application filed by the respondent under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. As a matter of fact, the appellant was humiliating and harassing the respondent on account of insufficient dowry having been brought by her. The appellant has given wrong title of the petition by showing the name of the previous husband of the respondent who had already obtained divorce and all facts were well within the knowledge of the appellant.
On merits, the petition has been contested on the ground that at the time of solemnization of marriage, sum of Rs.5 lacs was spent on the marriage and valuable dowry articles had been given to the appellant and his family members. The respondent wife admitted to have filed a petition under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 but the allegations of cruelty by her stand denied. The respondent has submitted that everything was disclosed to the appellant about her previous marriage prior to her marriage with appellant. The marriage with appellant is valid and it was solemnized with due knowledge of the appellant and his family members including the relations.
Also Read- Most Popular Questions on Divorce in India
The appellant was having all papers of divorce which he had not disclosed in the present petition. The appellant with his free consent had agreed to the re-marriage with the respondent as such there was neither any concealment of fact nor any ground for annulment of marriage. It is claimed that on account of petition having been filed at belated stage with manipulations, the same deserves to be dismissed.
Also Read- File Divorce Online in India
JUDGEMENT
In the present case as mentioned hereinabove, the appellant already had a knowledge about the marriage of the respondent with Ravinder Singh when he married the respondent. The date of marriage is December 12, 1997. A petition under Section 11 of the Act has been filed in the year 2012 after about 14 years. The intention of a party will also be a relevant factor in the circumstances of each case. In the present case, the petition is apparently filed with mala-fide intention as a counter-blast to the proceedings initiated by the wife for maintenance and under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
In view of the above circumstances, we do not find any infirmity in the judgment and decree dated March 4, 2015 passed by lower Court in dismissing the petition for declaring the marriage null and void.
The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and decree passed by the Family Court dated March 4, 2015 is hereby affirmed. The entire judgment can be read here.
Also Read- DIVORCE TO HUSBAND REJECTED BY HIGH COURT Chandigarh
CONCLUSION
The court finds that the appellant had already knowledge about the marriage of the respondent and the petition was filed by mala-fide intention and so the decree passed by family court is affirmative
For case specific advice please contact marriage disputes expert criminal divorce maintenance lawyers advocate in Chandigarh Panchkula Mohali Kharar Derabassi Baltana Zirakpur.
This post is written by Pranjal Rai.
More on 99888-17966.
