Family Pension Case CAT Tribunal Chandigarh

Family Pension Case CAT Tribunal Chandigarh

by

Last Updated on August 31, 2021 by Satish Mishra

Family Pension Case CAT Tribunal Chandigarh wherein applicant seeks similar relief in terms of Principal Bench of C.A.T titles Renu Gupta v. UOI etc. decided on 10/09/2018.

YOGESH DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

APPLICANT:

Yogesh Devi W/o Om Parkash aged 57 years, R/o House No. 491,

Sector 29-A, Chandigarh-160030, Group-C.

RESPONDENT:

  1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Defense, South Block, New Delhi-110011.
  2. Director General, Directorate of Personnel (Pers-9), Defence Research Development Organization (A), Block DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi-110105.
  3. Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad (UP)-211014.
  4. Director, Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory, Sector-30, Chandigarh-160030.

Also Read- Release of Retiral Benefits IAS CAT Tribunal Chandigarh Case

QUORUM:

Hon’ble Ms. Ajanta Dayalan, Member (A)

FACTS:

The applicant’s husband expired at very young age leaving behind the applicant and her minor daughter as such, the applicant has remarried and is now seeking family pension from the respondent department where her husband was employed.

Also Read- CONTRACTUAL APPOINTMENT APPEAL CAT Chandigarh

ARGUMENTS BY THE COUNSEL FOR APPLICANT:

It was argued that the counsel that a similar case was decided by the Principal Bench of C.A.T titles Renu Gupta v. UOI etc. decided on 10/09/2018 where the applicant was granted relief. The counsel pleaded for a similar relief to be granted to the applicant in this case. The learned counsel for the applicant further states that vide letter dated 27.5.2020 and 25.6.2019, inter-departmental correspondence has taken place between different authorities. However, the applicant vide letter dated 1.8.2019 has only been informed that her representation has been forwarded to the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) Allahabad for advice which is still awaited. The learned counsel stated that he will be satisfied if representation dated 4.12.2018 followed by reminder dated 24.7.2019 submitted by applicant for grant of family pension is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

JUDGMENT:

The court directed the competent authority amongst the respondents to consider and take a decision on the representation dated 4.12.2018 followed by reminder dated 24.7.2019 by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Order so passed be duly communicated to the applicant.

Also Read- Medical Charges Government Retired Employees CAT Case

This post is written by Gopika Thakur.

For case specific advice, please contact Chandigarh Administrative Tribunal/Service Matter/Labour and Service/CAT/Legal Aid/Administrative/Senior/Service Employment Lawyers Advocates in Chandigarh Panchkula Mohali Kharar Derabassi Zirakpur etc.

More on 99888-17966.

Call Us