Restructuring Cadre PGIMER CAT Chandigarh Case

Restructuring Cadre PGIMER CAT Chandigarh Case

by

Post covers Restructuring Cadre PGIMER CAT Chandigarh Case to grant the relevant benefit of the recommendations of the Coordination Committee.

COMPLAINT AGAINST PGIMER

The applicants have sought issuance of a direction to the respondents to implement the recommendations of the Coordination Committee for restructuring of cadre of Occupational Therapist, to which the applicants belong.

Also Read- CGST CAT Chandigarh Case Compassionate Appointment

Now let’s have the Judgment –

Judgment digest

Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench

Date of Decision – 6th February 2020

Complainant:

  1. Seema Chetri, aged 47 years, D/o Sh. G.C. Chetri, working as Senior Occupational Therapist, PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh – 160012.
  2. Bhavinder Singh Suchdev, aged 38 years, S/o Sh. Pritam Singh Suchdev, working as Occupational Therapist, PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh – 160012.
  3. Pritpal Singh, aged 38 years, S/o Sardar Uday Pratap Singh, working as Occupational Therapist, PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh-160012.
  4. Vinod Kumar, aged 44 years, S/o Sh. Mansha Ram, working as Occupational Therapist, PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh – 160012.
  5. Ranjit Pathak, aged 38 years, S/o Late Sh. Babban Pathak, working as Occupational Therapist, PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh – 160012

Opposites:

  1. Union of India through Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110001.
  2. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, through Director – 160012.

Quoram:

Sanjeev Kaushik, Member

Also Read- Gratuity Payment Case CAT Chandigarh – Legalseva.net

Facts of the Case:

  1. That the recommendations of the Co-ordination Committee, constituted for the purpose of examining the aspect of restructuring of stagnated cadres in the PGIMER, Chandigarh, at par with AIIMS New Delhi and JPIMER Chandigarh, qua the cadre of the applicants have already been forwarded by Respondent No. 1 to Respondent No. 2 vide communication dated 03.08.2016 and after examination by Respondent No. 2, it was again forwarded to Respondent No. 1 vide communication dated 13.11.2018.

He submitted that the relevant benefit has already been granted to cadre of Physiotherapist under the same department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine under which the cadre of applicants also falls.

It is alleged that the respondents have discriminated against the category of applicants i.e. Occupational Therapist.

That a representation dated 24.08.2018 has been filed by the applicant to Respondent No. 2 to grant the relevant benefit of the recommendations of the Coordination Committee which has been replied to vide letter dated 20.11.2018.

That the matter is under consideration with Respondent No. 1. He, therefore, suffered a statement that the applicants would be satisfied if a direction is issued to Respondent No. 1 to do the needful within a time bound manner.

Also Read- Pension Refixation Case CAT Chandigarh

Judgment:

Considering the short prayer made on behalf of the applicants, coupled with the fact that the case of the applicants for restructuring has already been recommended by the Coordination Committee, the O.A. is disposed of, with a direction to Respondent No. 1 to take a decision with regard to the cadre restructuring of the applicants expeditiously, in any case, not later than four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Needless to mention that the disposal of the O.A. shall not be construed as an expression of any opinion on the merit of the case. No costs.

Also Read- AFT CAT Tribunal – Legalseva.net

For case specific advice, please contact Chandigarh Administrative Tribunal/Service Matter/Labour and Service/CAT/Legal Aid/Administrative/Senior/Service Employment Lawyers Advocates in Chandigarh Panchkula Mohali Kharar Derabassi Zirakpur etc.

More on 99888-17966.

Call Us