Post covers Splendor Landbase Complaint RERA Panchkula Authority wherein Haryana RERA Orders Refund with Interest for Delayed Possession in Panipat Housing Project.
The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA), Panchkula, in an order dated 26 May 2026, directed a developer to refund the amount deposited by a homebuyer along with interest after finding that possession of the booked residential unit had not been delivered within the promised timeline.
If you need to file a formal complaint against Splendor Landbase Limited, you should directly approach the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HARERA) or the respective State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Splendor Landbase Complaint
The complaint arose from the booking of a residential unit in a housing project launched in Panipat, Haryana. The buyer had deposited substantial booking amounts based on assurances regarding development and timely possession. According to the complaint, despite the passage of several years, possession was neither offered nor was the deposited amount refunded.
The developer opposed the complaint on several grounds, including jurisdiction, limitation, and the contention that the project was not registered under RERA. It was also argued that the original project concept had undergone significant changes due to administrative and infrastructural issues.
Key Issues Considered by HRERA
The Authority examined multiple questions, including:
- Whether the complaint was maintainable despite the project not being registered under RERA.
- Whether the buyer qualified as an “allottee” under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
- Whether the claim was barred by limitation.
- Whether the buyer was entitled to seek refund with interest due to delay in possession.
Also Read- Haryana RERA Panchkula Complaint
Authority’s Findings
RERA Protection Not Restricted to Registered Projects
HRERA observed that the protections available under the RERA framework cannot be denied merely because a project is not registered. The Authority referred to the scheme and objectives of the Act and held that the statutory remedies available to homebuyers remain relevant where a promoter has failed to fulfil obligations relating to delivery of possession.
Homebuyer Recognized as an Allottee
The Authority further held that the absence of a formal builder-buyer agreement or allotment letter does not automatically deprive a purchaser of the status of an allottee where substantial payments have been accepted by the developer. Documentary evidence such as booking forms, receipts, and payment records were considered relevant for determining the relationship between the parties.
Delay in Possession Established
After examining the material on record, HRERA noted that possession had not been delivered within the expected timeline. The Authority found that despite the passage of many years, the project had not progressed in a manner that justified compelling the buyer to wait indefinitely.
The order emphasized that a homebuyer who invested funds with the expectation of receiving possession within the promised period cannot be compelled to continue waiting when the developer has failed to honour its commitments.
Right to Refund Reaffirmed
Relying upon the provisions of Section 18 of the RERA Act and judicial precedents, HRERA reiterated that where possession is not delivered as agreed, an allottee has the right to seek refund of the deposited amount along with applicable interest.
The Authority observed that the right to seek refund in cases of delayed possession is a substantive statutory remedy available to homebuyers.
Also Read-SPLENDOR+LANDBASE+LTD | Indian Case Law
Final Directions
Allowing the complaint, HRERA directed the developer to:
- Refund the amount deposited by the complainant.
- Pay interest in accordance with the prescribed rate under the Haryana RERA Rules.
- Comply with the directions within the stipulated period mentioned in the order.
Significance of the Order
This decision reinforces several important principles under real estate law:
- Delayed possession can entitle a homebuyer to seek refund with interest.
- A formal builder-buyer agreement is not always essential to establish allottee rights where payments have been accepted.
- Developers may remain accountable for project delays even in complex factual situations.
- RERA continues to provide an important consumer-protection framework for homebuyers facing prolonged uncertainty regarding possession.
Search to more on below Keywords to know more:
HRERA refund order, delayed possession refund, Haryana RERA judgment, homebuyer refund with interest, Section 18 RERA, Panipat housing project dispute, allottee rights under RERA, possession delay compensation, real estate refund case, Haryana RERA Panchkula order.
More on 99888-17966
