Post covers Arrest Showcause Notice Penalty In Rera Executions. Can builder be arrested under RERA via showcause Notice or Section 63 Penalty is discussed in detailed. According to Section 63 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the promoter of a project is liable to pay a penalty of up to 5% of … Read more
This post covers Express Project Pvt. Ltd RERA Panchkula Complaint wherein the main contention was maintenance charges being levied arbitrarily extra. INTRODUCTION In 2016 , Real Estate (Regional and Development) Act was introduced by the government of India with the aim to regulate the real estate industry and bring transparency and accountability that would protect … Read more
Post covers Allotees & Re-Allottees definition by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission when it comes to deciding relief in delay in possession claims. Allotees & Re-Allottees Rights in Delay in Possession In this case study, we will look into how the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission enshrined the principal laid down by the Honourable Supreme … Read more
Post covers CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST M/S ATS ESTATES PVT. LTD. seeking refund for delay in possession in Golf Meadows. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST M/S ATS ESTATES PVT. LTD Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against M/s Ats Estate Pvt. Ltd. in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and … Read more
Getting NOC for Property Sale Purchase in Zirakpur MC has been made mandatory by the current government. Follow this blog to understand the requirements for getting a NOC. NO Objection Certificate- NOC in short is government undertaking that the said plot/land/unit is free from any sort of government dues and hence can be sold/transferred or … Read more
This post covers RERA Appellate Tribunal Himachal Pradesh at Chandigarh where appeals from Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HPRERA) Shimla are being heard. The new website link of Himachal Pradesh RERA Authority is this one- https://hprera.nic.in/ The old one is just here for reference- http://www.hprera.in/WebSite/Home Therefore, under Section 43(4) of Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, … Read more
Chandigarh UT do have RERA Authority like RERA Punjab Authority and Haryana RERA Panchkula Authority but not that active since there is dearth of Real Estate Projects in Chandigarh. This can be made from the fact that the under the list of projects it shows figure zero. So certainly there is not much use of … Read more
Thinking of buying a property in Tricity, then talking to RERA Expert property advisor is a must. They can guide you well to understand the intricacies of a project when you are investing your hard earned money. Thinks to Consider- 1 Approvals- Valid License Number, upto date approvals from all authorities. Be it Municipal Body, … Read more
Post covers interest for delay in possession in ATS Golf Meadows Lifestyle RERA Punjab Complaint. To pay outstanding amount. Complaint Against ATS Estate Private Limited and Geenu Pawa This post is a summary of judgment wherein the complainant applied for one apartment in ATS Golf Meadows Lifestyle situated at village Madhopur, Tehsil Dera Bassi, District Mohali. … Read more
Now that you have got order from RERA Punjab Authority but still clueless what to do next. Then this post will guide you what follows after you have won the case from Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority be it refund, interest or compensation. I know it is complex and time consuming but that’s a part … Read more
Post covers Sushma Chandigarh Grand Zirakpur Consumer Case wherein court ordered refund for non delivery of possession. Consumer Complaint against Sushma Grand Zirakpur Project. The judgement came in this case was valid from every point as the complainants have also spend a lot of their savings by also procuring a loan and from what they … Read more
Post covers PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES Consumer Complaint Of project Hermitage park possession delayed. SUNNY DHURIA V. M.S PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES This is a suit filed before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh where the complainant filed a complaint against the respondents under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking compensation. COMPLAINANT: … Read more
Post coversTricity Home Search Builder Consumer Complaint wherein builder failed to provide possession on time. Hence Refund plus compensation. Consumer Protection act, the safeguard of the customer. Consumer Protection Act,1986 is a law to protect the interests of the consumers and provides safety to consumers regarding defective products, dissatisfactory services, and unfair trade practices. It … Read more
Post covers BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein builder failed to deliver possession on time. Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against Best Builders & Developers in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and the opposite party failed to deliver possession of the unit within the … Read more
Post covers Consumer Complaint Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd for deficiency in services related to defective wood work. GILCO DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS PVT. … VS AMARDEEP SINGH This post talks about an appeal filed before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab, challenging the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum dated 31.08.2012, … Read more
The post covers Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case whereon possession was not delivered on time & court allowed refund with interest plus compensation for delay. The applicant bought a residential penthouse in the opposite party’s housing scheme. For the payments the applicant took 35 lacs loan from the Punjab Bank and paid the amount … Read more
CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein refund of payment allowed with interest SBI MCLR +2%.
JUDGEMENT SUMMARY of Complaint before RERA Punjab Authority against CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint
HARISH MINOCHA V. CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 7th July, 2020
Today we are going to talk about the case of Harish Minocha v. Chandigarh overseas Pvt. Ltd., 7th July, 2020. The advocate for the complainant side was Ms. Banni Chibbar and for the respondent side was ex- parte.
Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund for refund for delay as possession not delivered on time to buyer. Let us have the judgment where refund was allowed along with compensation and litigation cost for mental harassment and agony. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Acme Builders Pvt. Ltd. Judgment digest: STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., … Read more
Post covers GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB regarding plots in ECO City where ‘R’ category plots were for residents of Punjab only. CHETNA SRIVASTAVA VS GMADA This post talks about filed this complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred as Ops) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the … Read more
Post Covers Consumer Complaint Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. wherein possession not delivered within 1 year. Refund granted by court plus compensation. The excerpts taken from Case Title- Kiran Singh vs Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Private Ltd. In CC/395/2017 decided on 16.3.2018. Introduction- Version of Complainant Complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite … Read more
RERA Panchkula Case against Omaxe Pvt Ltd wherein interest with compensation awarded for Delay. Let us have the case here titled as: MADAN LAL MUTNEJA V. M/s OMAXE PVT. LTD., 28th April, 2021 Omaxe Pvt Ltd Haryana RERA Panchkula Case Today we are going to talk about the case of Madan Lal Mutneja v. M/s … Read more
Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint wherein refund of amount was allowed for delay in possession. SUBHASH MALIK v. SUNCITY BUILDERS Pvt. LTD. A complaint was filed by the complainant, Subhash Malik, against the respondent, Suncity Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., to refund the amount paid by the complainant as the respondent had failed to make the … Read more
The post Gateway City PUDA Consumer Complaint Case covers compensation for delay in possession to complainant on said date as per BBA. NAVDEEP KAUR BOPARAI V. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANOTHER, 19th March 2021 Judgment by J. Also Read- puda appeal dismissed by rera appellate tribunal punjab Facts- Dr. Navdeep Kaur … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against M/S Country Colonisers Pvt. Ltd by the complainant under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Where consumer had booked a flat in their said project by paying all the amount. And in return the Respondent No.1 promised to deliver the possession within 30 months … Read more
In this post we will discuss about consumer Complaint against Barnala Builders & Property Consultants wherein the court held that Special limitation periods have been prescribed under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, its Rules 1987 and its Regulations 2005 for speedy disposal of consumer disputes and it is seen that the complainant has not displayed reasonable diligence … Read more
In this post we will discuss about M/S Tulip Infratech Pvt. Ltd HRERA case wherein The Authority while perusing the relevant records observed as per clause 6(a) of the Buyer Builder Agreement executed between the parties, complainant-developer has the remedy to cancel the allotment of respondent-allotee after deducting earnest money. Complaint to seek direction against … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against M/S WWICS Estate PVT. LTD wherein The complaint couldn’t be decided within the statutory period due to heavy pendency of court cases. Surindar Singh Vs. M/S WWICS Estate PVT. LTD. In this case, we will cover the property dispute between the consumer and the builder … Read more
In this post we will talk about the consumer complaint against M/S Regent Land Holdings PVT.LTD. The concern regulatory authority keeping the right and wrong of legal suit passed the order in favour of complaint. The respondent was unable to put forward any evidence, fact in support of delay in possession thus the forum ordered … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran Huda wherein the court directed the respondent to pay compensation to the complainant equivalent to the amount of interest payable on the amount of sale consideration i.e. Rs. 1,02,50,000/- from 29.04.2015 to 21.06.2018 at the rate prescribed in Rule 15 of … Read more
In this post we will discuss about HRERA complaint against Parsvnath Developers wherein the complaints werw allowed and the respondents were directed to allot and deliver the possession of booked plots to the complainants in the project Parsvnath City, Sonipat on payment of balance sale consideration recoverable from them. RERA Panchkula Complaint against Parsvnath. The … Read more
In this post we will discuss about a Consumer case for refund against Gillco Developers and Builders wherein The concerned regulatory authority keeping the right and wrong of legal suit passed the order in favour of complaint .The respondent was unable to put forward any evidence ,fact ,in support of delay in possession ,working of … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer complaint against Primary Estates & Developers wherein the opposition party were held liable and was directed to refund the amount of Rs.37,51,000/- to the complainant, alongwith interest @12% p.a. (simple) from the respective dates of deposit onwards, within a period of 30 days, from the date of receipt of … Read more
In this post we will discuss about RERA complaint against Manohar Infrastructure & Constructions wherein The authority held that the complainant is entitled to receive delayed compensation from the promoter which shall continue to be in her favor till the date of grant of an occupational certificate from the concerned department. The respondent shall hand … Read more
In this post we will discuss about the detailed procedure for getting back the mandatory deposit amount required for filing an appeal in HREAT. How to get refund of the amount deposited by the Appellant with the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal As per Section-43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, any … Read more
Complaint for Execution of RERA orders against Omaxe Pvt.Ltd Summary-In this post we will discuss about a complaint that has been filed by the complainant seeking execution of order dated 05.03.2019 passed by HARYANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY PANCHKULA COMPLAINT FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER passed by the HARYANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY PANCHKULA … Read more
In this post we will discuss about the legality of Assured return plans/Assured return schemes in various court of laws in India. Assured return scheme/Assured return plan is the most popular bait that comes before homebuyers given by developers to lure into the property purchase but only a few can continue this till end and … Read more
Builder not liable for compensation if delay is by Government Department. In this post we will discuss about the case of Ultratech developers wherein the buyer was granted interest for the period of delay but no compensation was awarded because the respondent was not responsible for delay. Rajat Chawla v. M/s Ultratech Township Developers Pvt. … Read more
Bureaucratic delays not an excuse for filing appeals beyond the period of limitation. In this post we will discuss about the law of limitation and whether government bodies can file a case beyond this period of limitation on the grounds of bureaucratic delay. Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) is an act passed by … Read more
In this post we will discuss about the quasi-retroactive application of the RERA ACT, 2016 and whether it is applicable when the transactions are still in the process even though the sale agreements had been executed before the Act came into force. Judgment Digest: Anjana Goyal and Another vs Sushma Buildtech Ltd. This recent judgment … Read more
This is a post of Sandwoods Infratech Projects RERA Punjab Complaint wherein the refund was allowed by the Adjudicating officer with interest as per rate stipulated in RERA Punjab Rules. Judgment Digest: Kanisth Ganeriwala and Another vs Sandwoods Infratech Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Parika Ganeriwala and Another vs Sandwoods Infratech Projects Pvt. Ltd. In this … Read more
This post covers judgment of Haryana RERA Panchkula Complaint against TDI Infrastructure wherein complainant sought refund of money from the project along with interest and delay compensation on account of non-timely delivery of possession. The relief of refund of relief was not accepted but interest of account of delay was awarded to the complainant. This … Read more
This post is a judgment digest of Haryana RERA Panchkula Complaint against Piyush Buildwell wherein the builder demanded higher amount for conveyance deed which was not as per agreed terms of builder buyer agreement. Hence court directed to take reasonable amount for getting conveyance deed done. Also Read- Execution of Rera Panchkula Orders In combine … Read more
Basic overview of the Article. This article is basically written for the remedies which a Homebuyers have when there rights are violated. Earlier homebuyers were facing a lot of problems relating to the purchase of the properties from builders or developers. There were trapped in the burden of interest in a hope of buying home … Read more
POWERS OF ADJUDICATING OFFICER IN RERA Due to the rapid growth of the Indian economy and the continuous migration of people from rural to urban areas, the need of housing increased at a rapid pace. This shift had a positive effect on the Real Estate sector, and with the continuous growth in the real estate … Read more
There are many instances where Builders unilaterally cancel the allotment of unit and forfeit the money of home buyer. The said practise of Builders has been done to cover up delay in possession and then they except home buyers to continue paying future payments. Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram in notification dated 05.12.2018 clearly … Read more
In this post we are going to discuss the most recent consumer complaint decided against the builder namely Omaxe Chandigarh Extension decided on 10.09.2019 by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) Chandigarh. Let’s break the entire judgment and get straight to facts: Party Name – Alka Khera, Dheeraj Dumir CC/62/ of 2019, Date of Decision– … Read more
Real estate under the Outstretch of GST GST stands for goods and services tax. It is a destination based tax regime wherein the tax liability shall be borne by consumer of good or service concerned. GST is applicable to any activity which is supply of any good or service.Thus, GST shall be collected upon any … Read more
Call Us