Post covers GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB regarding plots in ECO City where ‘R’ category plots were for residents of Punjab only. CHETNA SRIVASTAVA VS GMADA This post talks about filed this complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred as Ops) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the … Read more
Post Covers Consumer Complaint Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. wherein possession not delivered within 1 year. Refund granted by court plus compensation. The excerpts taken from Case Title- Kiran Singh vs Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Private Ltd. In CC/395/2017 decided on 16.3.2018. Introduction- Version of Complainant Complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite … Read more
Post covers Extension in Service Case High Court Chandigarh The policy granting extension to the employees has since been scrapped by the Punjab Government Case- SURESH KUMAR VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS The petitioner, Suresh Kumar, filed a civil writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, under article 226/227 of the … Read more
This post covers Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd Wherein court granted compensation for delay in possession. Gurdev Kaur Thind vs Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. on 21 December, 2020 Complaint case No: 15 of 2020Date of Institution: 08.01.2020Date of Decision: 21.12.2020 FACTS OF THE CASE: It is the case of the complainant that despite receiving … Read more
ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD project namely Premium Homes in Gulmohar Valley Lalru where refund granted for delay. HEMLATA v. ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD COMPLAINANT: Hemlata, wife of Kuldeep Singh Kuldeep Singh, son. Of Sh. Sham Singh OPPOSITE PARTIES: Allied Infrazone & Developers Pvt. Ltd Syed Hussain Shanaz, The Director, Allied Infrazone … Read more
This post covers Interest on Delay in Gratuity Payment CAT Case where court found delay unusual & was a case of Voluntary retirement. Hence no merit. Delay in Gratuity – Education Department Payment (Renu Anand v. Union Territory Chandigarh) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the courts with respect … Read more
Alchemist Hospital Consumer Complaint Case wherein appeal was dismissed as no case of Medical Negligence made out. ALCHEMIST HOSPITAL VS DHARMENDRA THAKUR This post talks about a complaint filed before the State Dispute Consumer Redressal Forum, where the previously decided two appeals of this court was disposed of by the passing of the current order. … Read more
SKYRISE BUILDERS VENETIAN TOWER CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein shop not delivered on time & refund granted with interest and compensation. Case – Harvinder Singh Bedi vs Skyrise Builders on 29 January, 2018 This post is a summary of judgment wherein OP floated a scheme for allotment of shops/showrooms/office space/food courts under the name and style of Skyrise … Read more
Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein refund allowed to complainant along with compensation and interest for delay. Case- Anjali Dogra And Ors v. Emerging Valley (p) Ltd. And Ors Judgment digest STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH Complaint case No.: 80 of 2019 Date of Institution: 10.04.2019 Date of Decision: 04.01.2021 Complainant: Anjali … Read more
TDI Infracorp State Commission Haryana Complaint JUDGEMENT SUMMARY GIAN DEVI V. T.D.I. INFRACORP LTD, 12th September, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Gian Devi v. T.D.I. Infracorp Ltd, 12th September, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side were J.P. Chaudhary and for the respondent (opposite party) Shri. Ajay Ghangas the … Read more
RERA Panchkula Case against Omaxe Pvt Ltd wherein interest with compensation awarded for Delay. Let us have the case here titled as: MADAN LAL MUTNEJA V. M/s OMAXE PVT. LTD., 28th April, 2021 Omaxe Pvt Ltd Haryana RERA Panchkula Case Today we are going to talk about the case of Madan Lal Mutneja v. M/s … Read more
Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint wherein refund of amount was allowed for delay in possession. SUBHASH MALIK v. SUNCITY BUILDERS Pvt. LTD. A complaint was filed by the complainant, Subhash Malik, against the respondent, Suncity Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., to refund the amount paid by the complainant as the respondent had failed to make the … Read more
Transfer of Investigation Case High Court Chandigarh must insist establish and prove them from the facts and circumstances to the satisfaction of the court JUDGEMENT SUMMARY GAUR GURPREET V. STATE OF PUNJAB, 12th August, 2013 Also Read- Punjab Haryana High Court Chandigarh Today we are going to talk about the case of Gaur Gurpreet v. … Read more
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Complaint for Refund wherein refund was allowed for delay in possession. ALKA KHERA VS M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION By stating the act and conduct of the opposite parties, under section 17 of the consumer Protection Act, 1986, it is said to amount to deficiency in providing service and adoption of unfair trade … Read more
AMAZING REAL ESTATE PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein cancellation unit was under challenge by Builder. SAPNA V. M/S AMAZING REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD, 12th October, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Sapna v. M/s Amazing Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, 12th October, 2020. The advocates for the complainant side was Shri. Varun … Read more
Future City Developers Punjab RERA Complaint wherein mutual settlement was arrived with complainants for removing deficiencies. JUDGEMENT SUMMARY SAURABH KHANNA V. M/S FUTURE CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD, 26th June, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Saurabh Khanna v. Future City Developers Pvt . ltd, 26th June, 2020. The advocates for … Read more
The post Gateway City PUDA Consumer Complaint Case covers compensation for delay in possession to complainant on said date as per BBA. NAVDEEP KAUR BOPARAI V. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANOTHER, 19th March 2021 Judgment by J. Also Read- puda appeal dismissed by rera appellate tribunal punjab Facts- Dr. Navdeep Kaur … Read more
DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein court allowed refund compensation for delay. VARUN SALWAN VS M/S DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE AND OTHER The complainant had filed a case under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the opposite parties before the State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, Punjab Chandigarh. COMPLAINANT: Varun Salwan S/o Sh. … Read more
NON-FUNCTIONAL UPGRADATION CAT Chandigarh Case while relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M. Subramaniam (supra). Judgement Digest: Virender Singh Versus Union of India & Ors. Case Briefing: The present O.A. has been filed by the applicant for grant of Non-Functional Upgradation in the Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- w.e.f. … Read more
Benefit of notional increment purely for pensionary purpose and no other benefit. IB Notional Increment 23.9,2020 after retirement The case study is regarding the large number of cases of notional increment for pensionary benefits to those Central government servants who have retired on 30th June. The case of P. Ayyamperumal Vs Registrar played an important … Read more
TOPIC- Retiral Dues (Sham Singh v. Govt. Of India through Secretary) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the court with respect to issuing orders guiding the functioning of other authorities. This analysis will provide an in-depth assimilation of the extent of the power the courts enjoy in such cases. … Read more
CAT Chandigarh RAILWAY Compassionate APPOINMENT CASE wherein medical examination, the applicant was declared medically unfit due to low vision. Also Read- PGIMER NURSING OFFICER CASE CAT Tribunal Chandigarh FACTS OF THE CASE The applicant’s father who was a loco-pilot Gr.I in the respondents office expired in August 2019 while in service. Thereafter, the applicant applied … Read more
Family Pension Case CAT Tribunal Chandigarh wherein applicant seeks similar relief in terms of Principal Bench of C.A.T titles Renu Gupta v. UOI etc. decided on 10/09/2018. YOGESH DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. APPLICANT: Yogesh Devi W/o Om Parkash aged 57 years, R/o House No. 491, Sector 29-A, Chandigarh-160030, Group-C. RESPONDENT: Union of … Read more
COMMERCIAL PURPOSE NOT COVERED U/S 17(1) (a) (i), CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 Judgement Digest: KUSUM KAPOOR V. M/S SPIRIT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Case Briefing: The present complaint is filed by the complainant under Section 17(1) (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act). The complainant entered into Memorandum of Understanding (in … Read more
Medical Charges Government Retired Employees CAT Case wherein court answered whether they are entitled for reimbursement. DHARAM PAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. The petition was filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh bench, where the applicant challenged the impugned order which was rejected for the reimbursement of his medical charges on the plea … Read more
Release of Retiral Benefits IAS CAT Tribunal Chandigarh Case wherein it was withheld lieu of pending chargesheet inquiry against the officer. Guidance of the Court (Sukhjit Singh Bains, IAS (Retd.) v. Union of India) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the court with respect to issuing orders guiding the … Read more
SHAURYA TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD Consumer Complaint wherein the interest was awarded for delay in possession. RAVINDER SINGH V. SHAURYA TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD, 19th April, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Ravinder Singh v. Shaurya Township Pvt. Ltd, 19th April, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side was Sh. H.S. Gharuan … Read more
Property dispute case wherein appointment of local commissioner was challenged before High Court Chandigarh. Review Petition under Art 227 Art 22 of Indian Constitution, empowers the High Courts to have superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction, except a court formed under a law related to … Read more
Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench KV Case wherein court analyzes how much of an order has been complied with the authorities. Judgment Name- Fulfillment of Order (Jyoti Maini v. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of HRD ) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the court with respect … Read more
The applicants were the aspirant of the B.Sc. Nursing and wanted to take admission in NINE. As per the advertisement by the respondent regarding the Nursing Officer, they were appointed by back door and not by open competition which is illegal. The applicant sought the complaint that the Fundamental Rights of the applicant. The respondent’s … Read more
This post is about Trinity Multi State Co-operative Credit Society Consumer Complaint where it failed to provide maturity amount. Unfair Trade Practices ( Daljeet Kumar Bansal v. Trinity Multi State Co-operative Credit Society) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the Section 12 of the consumer protection Act. This analysis will provide an … Read more
HVAT Case in Punjab and Haryana High Court wherein the refund was not processed as per assessment order u/s 15(1). This post is a summary of judgment wherein the petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that no refund has been issued to it as per the assessment order dated 18.03.2015 issued under Section 15(1) … Read more
The post talks about Review Application Chandigarh Central Administrative Tribunal in line with case of Shiva Kant Jha v. UOI. CAT REVIEW ACCOUNT GENERAL PUNJAB RAJE RAM LAMBA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. In this post, the topic is discussion is related to a review application that was filed by the applicant to review … Read more
Kim Infrastructure and Developers ltd. Consumer Complaint for unfair trade practice and deficiency in services. This post is a summary of judgment wherein the complainants stated that there is a deficiency and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties, firstly by collecting investments from complainants without any approval of the scheme/plan from the … Read more
Nitishree Infrastructure Consumer Complaint for Delay wherein builder failed to deliver possession within stipulated time. CASE SUMMARY: In this case the Learned counsel for the complainants has vehemently contended that the complainants were allotted flat No. E-3/404, measuring 1565 sq. ft. for basic price of Rs.21,91,000/- and Flat Buyer’s Agreement Ex.C-3 was executed between the … Read more
The post talks about Primary Estates & Developers Pvt Ltd wherein builder failed to oblige mandate of Section 18 of RERA. Thus held liable to pay interest compensation for contravention. RELIEF CLAIMED U/S18 RERA, 2016 Also Read- CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST PRIMARY ESTATES AND DEVELOPERS Judgement Digest: Sat Prakash Chauhan vs. M/s Primary Estates & Developers … Read more
The post covers critical analysis of nullity of marriage in Hindu Law viz sections Section 5, Section 11 & 12, Section 13. Through this post one can understand in the end, how would a marriage be declared null and void through courts in India. Introduction Marriage is a ceremonial union of individuals along with their … Read more
This post covers SBP SHINESTAR Pvt. LTD Consumer Complaint judgment wherein the complaint got dismissed by the commission on ground of maintainability as complainant has filed complaints before other fora’s as well. In consumer law two parallel remedies cannot be availed for the same issue. NEERAJ SARMAI v. SBP SHINESTAR Pvt. LTD COMPLAINANT: Neeraj Sarmai … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against M/s Universal Infrastructures wherein the court ordered to obtain Completion Certificate and Occupancy Certificate in respect of the flat/project in question, to comply with the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Punjab Apartment Ownership Act, 1995 and provide registered maintenance society to the complainants within … Read more
Overall, the pendency of cases has increased significantly at every judicial hierarchy level in the last decade. Between 2006 and now, there has been an overall increase of 22% (64 lakh cases) in the pendency of cases across all courts. Over the years, due to the growing pendency of cases for long periods, the number … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against M/S Country Colonisers Pvt. Ltd by the complainant under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Where consumer had booked a flat in their said project by paying all the amount. And in return the Respondent No.1 promised to deliver the possession within 30 months … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Opening Bank Locker Consumer Case wherein The District Consumer forum took notice that it was admitted by the opposite party that deceased Sh. MR Bansal have bank locker in his name and from copy of death certificate it was proved on the file that said Mangat Rai Bansal … Read more
In this post we will discuss about consumer Complaint against Barnala Builders & Property Consultants wherein the court held that Special limitation periods have been prescribed under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, its Rules 1987 and its Regulations 2005 for speedy disposal of consumer disputes and it is seen that the complainant has not displayed reasonable diligence … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against Maya Garden City wherein the court ordered to deliver the possession of flat on payment of any balance payment if due according to the buyer’s agreement, pay penalty @ Rs. 5/- per sq. ft. of the super area from 16.6.2017 per month till the delivery … Read more
In this post we will discuss about M/S Tulip Infratech Pvt. Ltd HRERA case wherein The Authority while perusing the relevant records observed as per clause 6(a) of the Buyer Builder Agreement executed between the parties, complainant-developer has the remedy to cancel the allotment of respondent-allotee after deducting earnest money. Complaint to seek direction against … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce case wherein the petition was allowed, in exercise of powers under Sections 397, 401 and 482 of the Cr.P.C., to the extent of extension of time for deposit of 25% of the amount of compensation awarded by the trial Court to the period of 90 days permitted … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against M/S WWICS Estate PVT. LTD wherein The complaint couldn’t be decided within the statutory period due to heavy pendency of court cases. Surindar Singh Vs. M/S WWICS Estate PVT. LTD. In this case, we will cover the property dispute between the consumer and the builder … Read more
In this post we will talk about the consumer complaint against M/S Regent Land Holdings PVT.LTD. The concern regulatory authority keeping the right and wrong of legal suit passed the order in favour of complaint. The respondent was unable to put forward any evidence, fact in support of delay in possession thus the forum ordered … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against M/S Geetu Construction Pvt. Ltd wherein the court ordered to refund ₹23,40,000/- to the complainants, along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, to pay ₹2,00,000/-, as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment to the complainants and to pay₹20,000/-, as litigation expenses. … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Sahara India Pariwar Housing Unit SCDRC Appeal wherein The Appellants were directed to refund Rs.92,896/- to the Respondent No.1/complainant alongwith interest @ 18% p.a. instead of 24% p.a. from the respective dates of deposit till payment, within 60 days of its receipt, to pay an amount of Rs.25,000/- … Read more
Call Us