Post covers delay in possession complaint for refund against Best Zone Builders & Developers in Consumer Court along with Compensation. Best Zone Builders & Developers Consumer Complaint for Refund. This post is a summary of judgment wherein the complainants have filed this complaint, under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the opposite parties, seeking the … Read more
Delay in Possession of a Flat in Mona City Homes Township case before RERA Punjab Authority wherein Refund granted along with interest for deficiency in services. Mona City Homes Complaint for Delay in Possession Punjab RERA TITLE: MONA TOWNSHIP CASE INTRODUCTION Section 18 of the RERA talks about the return of amount and compensation. “If … Read more
Post covers Sushma Chandigarh Grand Zirakpur Consumer Case wherein court ordered refund for non delivery of possession. Consumer Complaint against Sushma Grand Zirakpur Project. The judgement came in this case was valid from every point as the complainants have also spend a lot of their savings by also procuring a loan and from what they … Read more
Post covers Tricity Media Cooperative Housing Society Complaint for failure to deliver plot on time. Thus, Refund. The court directed society to handover the possession of plat with interest. In the eventuality, they are unable to give, then refund of the entire amount shall be made with compensation. Case Title- AMIT MAHAJAN v. TRICITY MEDIA … Read more
Post covers Land Twister Homes Consumer Complaint whereon compensation for delay in possession awarded to buyer. PAPRA Act, the protector of the customers from exploitation Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act which came into force in the year of 1986 to protect the interest of the buyers of plots/flats. This act provides for the registration … Read more
Post covers PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES Consumer Complaint Of project Hermitage park possession delayed. SUNNY DHURIA V. M.S PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES This is a suit filed before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh where the complainant filed a complaint against the respondents under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking compensation. COMPLAINANT: … Read more
Post coversTricity Home Search Builder Consumer Complaint wherein builder failed to provide possession on time. Hence Refund plus compensation. Consumer Protection act, the safeguard of the customer. Consumer Protection Act,1986 is a law to protect the interests of the consumers and provides safety to consumers regarding defective products, dissatisfactory services, and unfair trade practices. It … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against NH Matcon Aero homes wherein pecuniary jurisdiction was discussed. The Court held that in the present case value of the property was more than Rs.30 lacs which was much more beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Forum. When District Forum was not having jurisdiction … Read more
Post covers Consumer Case VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Judgment whereon the possession was offered after delay. Hence interest. SHYAM LAL DOGRA VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. FACTS OF THE CASE: In the complaint it has been alleged that the agreement for sale of the apartment No.744 in the project of “Gillo Palms”, sector 115, … Read more
Post covers TDI City Consumer Case for Refund of Amount wherein only symbolic possession was given sans completion certificate which is not legal as per law. Let’s read the case now. TITLE: RAJESH ARORA CASE FACTS OF THE CASE: The complainant booked a plot in the respondent’s scheme known as “TDI city”. This complaint has … Read more
Post covers BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein builder failed to deliver possession on time. Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against Best Builders & Developers in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and the opposite party failed to deliver possession of the unit within the … Read more
The post covers Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case whereon possession was not delivered on time & court allowed refund with interest plus compensation for delay. The applicant bought a residential penthouse in the opposite party’s housing scheme. For the payments the applicant took 35 lacs loan from the Punjab Bank and paid the amount … Read more
Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund for refund for delay as possession not delivered on time to buyer. Let us have the judgment where refund was allowed along with compensation and litigation cost for mental harassment and agony. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Acme Builders Pvt. Ltd. Judgment digest: STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., … Read more
Post covers GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB regarding plots in ECO City where ‘R’ category plots were for residents of Punjab only. CHETNA SRIVASTAVA VS GMADA This post talks about filed this complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred as Ops) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the … Read more
Post Covers Consumer Complaint Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. wherein possession not delivered within 1 year. Refund granted by court plus compensation. The excerpts taken from Case Title- Kiran Singh vs Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Private Ltd. In CC/395/2017 decided on 16.3.2018. Introduction- Version of Complainant Complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite … Read more
This post covers Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd Wherein court granted compensation for delay in possession. Gurdev Kaur Thind vs Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. on 21 December, 2020 Complaint case No: 15 of 2020Date of Institution: 08.01.2020Date of Decision: 21.12.2020 FACTS OF THE CASE: It is the case of the complainant that despite receiving … Read more
Recently, cases wherein builders or purchasers causing unreasonable delay in handing over the possession of the property are on a rise. The builders refuse to handover the property even after the amount agreed has been paid by the buyer. The buyers are left in a lurch without no affirmation whatsoever. It happens so often that … Read more
Call Us