This case talks about ATS Estates Complaint in Consumer Court wherein refund was allowed to homebuyer. Assuring More Powers to Customers In this case, we will talk about how State Commission asserted more power to the customers and made customer believe that there is a watchman who is safeguarding their interest during unfair practice. The … Read more
This post covers Express Project Pvt. Ltd RERA Panchkula Complaint wherein the main contention was maintenance charges being levied arbitrarily extra. INTRODUCTION In 2016 , Real Estate (Regional and Development) Act was introduced by the government of India with the aim to regulate the real estate industry and bring transparency and accountability that would protect … Read more
The applicant filed an application for the delay of condonation due to the technical error by the bank. Facts of the case revolves with the possession. After listening to the both sides of the court held that the contention of the opposite party is not applicable and the complainant is entitled to the refund policy. … Read more
This post covers Consumer Complaint against Hero Reality Pvt. Ltd. In state consumer commission wherein the forfeiture of amount is justified by court. Importance of the signed application This case study will focus on how the state commission gave importance to the obligation of the complainant which it is supposed to fulfil. The commission gave … Read more
This post covers Reliant Infrastructure Private Consumer Complaint when Interest follows when there is an order for refund. When a court orders a refund on the amount paid by a party, the party’s right to ask for interest follows. This is a settled law which was held by Honourable Supreme Court, and in this case … Read more
This post covers Consumer Complaint Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd wherein complainant asked to clear dues. Tajinder Kumar Sharma & Anr. Vs. M/s. Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd. The present post will cover and give an overview of the case and it will give you a brief yet precise outline regarding all the major facts … Read more
This case covers QUASHING THE APPEAL TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS v. ADITYA TOMAR against State Commission order. The present post will cover and give an overview of the case and it will give you a brief yet precise outline regarding all the major facts and issues involved in this particular case which basically … Read more
This post covers Marvel Homes Construction Consumer Complaint for deficiency of services. Dial 99888-17966 to know more. Sheenu vs M/S Marvel Homes Construction on 17 May, 2018 Date of Institution: 29.09.2017 Date of Reserve: 30.04.2018 Date of Decision: 17.05.2018 Also Read- Sheenu vs M/S Marvel Homes Construction … on 17 May, 2018 FACTS OF THE … Read more
This post covers RERA Punjab Complaint against of HERO REALITY PRIVATE LTD where refund was sought with interest & Litigation expenses. Case Title- KAPIL TADON Vs. HERO REALITY PRIVATE LTD Also Read- Open Forum about Hero Homes, Mohali – Commonfloor.com FACTS OF THE CASE: Kapil Tandon who is also referred to as the complainant has … Read more
This post is a summary of judgment wherein consumer complaint was preferred against United India Insurance Company Limited in State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh in respect of issue related to repudiation of claim made by the owner of the vehicle which is duly insured with the Company, solely on the ground the driver of … Read more
This post is a summary of judgment wherein the complainant has filed the complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the OPs on the averments that he entered into an agreement for allotment of the flat comprising of 1379 sq. ft but at the time of possession the possession of the super built … Read more
CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST ALCHEMIST HOSPITAL IN lieu OF MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against Alchemist Hospital Panchkula through its Directors in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Haryana, Panchkula. Whereby complaint filed by him alleging medical negligence and deficiency in service. Then Complainant sought compensation of Rs. 17.00 Lacs. Also Read- … Read more
This post covers STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB CONSUMER APPEAL against GULMOHAR VALLEY dismissed being devoid of merits. Citation- Recovery (Ashok Kumar vs Punjab Empires Pvt. Ltd.) This analysis will provide an in-depth assimilation of the extent of the power the state consumer dispute Redressal commissions enjoy in such cases. It will also highlight the importance of … Read more
Post covers Allotees & Re-Allottees definition by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission when it comes to deciding relief in delay in possession claims. Allotees & Re-Allottees Rights in Delay in Possession In this case study, we will look into how the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission enshrined the principal laid down by the Honourable Supreme … Read more
Post covers CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST M/S ATS ESTATES PVT. LTD. seeking refund for delay in possession in Golf Meadows. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST M/S ATS ESTATES PVT. LTD Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against M/s Ats Estate Pvt. Ltd. in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and … Read more
Post covers Sushma Chandigarh Grand Zirakpur Consumer Case wherein court ordered refund for non delivery of possession. Consumer Complaint against Sushma Grand Zirakpur Project. The judgement came in this case was valid from every point as the complainants have also spend a lot of their savings by also procuring a loan and from what they … Read more
Post covers Tricity Media Cooperative Housing Society Complaint for failure to deliver plot on time. Thus, Refund. The court directed society to handover the possession of plat with interest. In the eventuality, they are unable to give, then refund of the entire amount shall be made with compensation. Case Title- AMIT MAHAJAN v. TRICITY MEDIA … Read more
Post covers Land Twister Homes Consumer Complaint whereon compensation for delay in possession awarded to buyer. PAPRA Act, the protector of the customers from exploitation Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act which came into force in the year of 1986 to protect the interest of the buyers of plots/flats. This act provides for the registration … Read more
Post covers Sanskriti Group Of Companies RERA Complaint wherein refund granted for possession Delay. RERA Punjab Complaint against Sanskriti Group Of Companies The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, protector of the home-buyers This bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 10th March 2016 and by Lok Sabha on 15th March 2016 and … Read more
Post covers PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES Consumer Complaint Of project Hermitage park possession delayed. SUNNY DHURIA V. M.S PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES This is a suit filed before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh where the complainant filed a complaint against the respondents under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking compensation. COMPLAINANT: … Read more
Post coversTricity Home Search Builder Consumer Complaint wherein builder failed to provide possession on time. Hence Refund plus compensation. Consumer Protection act, the safeguard of the customer. Consumer Protection Act,1986 is a law to protect the interests of the consumers and provides safety to consumers regarding defective products, dissatisfactory services, and unfair trade practices. It … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against NH Matcon Aero homes wherein pecuniary jurisdiction was discussed. The Court held that in the present case value of the property was more than Rs.30 lacs which was much more beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Forum. When District Forum was not having jurisdiction … Read more
Post covers Consumer Case VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Judgment whereon the possession was offered after delay. Hence interest. SHYAM LAL DOGRA VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. FACTS OF THE CASE: In the complaint it has been alleged that the agreement for sale of the apartment No.744 in the project of “Gillo Palms”, sector 115, … Read more
Post covers TDI City Consumer Case for Refund of Amount wherein only symbolic possession was given sans completion certificate which is not legal as per law. Let’s read the case now. TITLE: RAJESH ARORA CASE FACTS OF THE CASE: The complainant booked a plot in the respondent’s scheme known as “TDI city”. This complaint has … Read more
Post covers BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein builder failed to deliver possession on time. Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against Best Builders & Developers in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and the opposite party failed to deliver possession of the unit within the … Read more
APPEAL BEFORE STATE CONSUMER COMMISSION AGAINST IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS Canam Consultants Consumer Complaint Immigration Case wherein Appeal upheld. Also Read- Navtej Singh vs Canam Consultants Ltd on 6 December, 2010 Let’s have the case here- Judgement Digest: Navtej Singh s/o S.Lal Singh resident of #3114, Sector 71, Mohalivs. Canam Consultants Ltd., SCO No.83-84, Sector 17-D,ChandigarhAlso Read- Akshay … Read more
Post covers Consumer Complaint Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd for deficiency in services related to defective wood work. GILCO DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS PVT. … VS AMARDEEP SINGH This post talks about an appeal filed before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab, challenging the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum dated 31.08.2012, … Read more
The post covers Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case whereon possession was not delivered on time & court allowed refund with interest plus compensation for delay. The applicant bought a residential penthouse in the opposite party’s housing scheme. For the payments the applicant took 35 lacs loan from the Punjab Bank and paid the amount … Read more
The post covers SBI General Insurance Consumer Complaint wherein policy not renewed on time as reminder not sent & appeal filed against District Forum Order. Consumer Appeal against State Bank of India General Insurance Company Ltd. and others. This post is a summary of a judgement wherein consumer appeal was preferred against the decision of … Read more
CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein refund of payment allowed with interest SBI MCLR +2%.
JUDGEMENT SUMMARY of Complaint before RERA Punjab Authority against CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint
HARISH MINOCHA V. CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 7th July, 2020
Today we are going to talk about the case of Harish Minocha v. Chandigarh overseas Pvt. Ltd., 7th July, 2020. The advocate for the complainant side was Ms. Banni Chibbar and for the respondent side was ex- parte.
WWICS Immigration Consultancy Consumer Complaint wherein the refund was allowed from court with interest for not delivering on promise. Let’s have the judgment here- SONAM SEHGAL V. WORLDWIDE IMMIGRATION CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT. LTD., 30th July, 2018 Today we are going to talk about the case of Sonam Sehgal v. WWICS (worldwide immigration consultancy services Pvt. … Read more
Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund for refund for delay as possession not delivered on time to buyer. Let us have the judgment where refund was allowed along with compensation and litigation cost for mental harassment and agony. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Acme Builders Pvt. Ltd. Judgment digest: STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., … Read more
Post covers GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB regarding plots in ECO City where ‘R’ category plots were for residents of Punjab only. CHETNA SRIVASTAVA VS GMADA This post talks about filed this complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred as Ops) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the … Read more
Post Covers Consumer Complaint Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. wherein possession not delivered within 1 year. Refund granted by court plus compensation. The excerpts taken from Case Title- Kiran Singh vs Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Private Ltd. In CC/395/2017 decided on 16.3.2018. Introduction- Version of Complainant Complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite … Read more
This post covers Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd Wherein court granted compensation for delay in possession. Gurdev Kaur Thind vs Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. on 21 December, 2020 Complaint case No: 15 of 2020Date of Institution: 08.01.2020Date of Decision: 21.12.2020 FACTS OF THE CASE: It is the case of the complainant that despite receiving … Read more
ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD project namely Premium Homes in Gulmohar Valley Lalru where refund granted for delay. HEMLATA v. ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD COMPLAINANT: Hemlata, wife of Kuldeep Singh Kuldeep Singh, son. Of Sh. Sham Singh OPPOSITE PARTIES: Allied Infrazone & Developers Pvt. Ltd Syed Hussain Shanaz, The Director, Allied Infrazone … Read more
Alchemist Hospital Consumer Complaint Case wherein appeal was dismissed as no case of Medical Negligence made out. ALCHEMIST HOSPITAL VS DHARMENDRA THAKUR This post talks about a complaint filed before the State Dispute Consumer Redressal Forum, where the previously decided two appeals of this court was disposed of by the passing of the current order. … Read more
SKYRISE BUILDERS VENETIAN TOWER CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein shop not delivered on time & refund granted with interest and compensation. Case – Harvinder Singh Bedi vs Skyrise Builders on 29 January, 2018 This post is a summary of judgment wherein OP floated a scheme for allotment of shops/showrooms/office space/food courts under the name and style of Skyrise … Read more
Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein refund allowed to complainant along with compensation and interest for delay. Case- Anjali Dogra And Ors v. Emerging Valley (p) Ltd. And Ors Judgment digest STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH Complaint case No.: 80 of 2019 Date of Institution: 10.04.2019 Date of Decision: 04.01.2021 Complainant: Anjali … Read more
TDI Infracorp State Commission Haryana Complaint JUDGEMENT SUMMARY GIAN DEVI V. T.D.I. INFRACORP LTD, 12th September, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Gian Devi v. T.D.I. Infracorp Ltd, 12th September, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side were J.P. Chaudhary and for the respondent (opposite party) Shri. Ajay Ghangas the … Read more
Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint wherein refund of amount was allowed for delay in possession. SUBHASH MALIK v. SUNCITY BUILDERS Pvt. LTD. A complaint was filed by the complainant, Subhash Malik, against the respondent, Suncity Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., to refund the amount paid by the complainant as the respondent had failed to make the … Read more
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Complaint for Refund wherein refund was allowed for delay in possession. ALKA KHERA VS M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION By stating the act and conduct of the opposite parties, under section 17 of the consumer Protection Act, 1986, it is said to amount to deficiency in providing service and adoption of unfair trade … Read more
The post Gateway City PUDA Consumer Complaint Case covers compensation for delay in possession to complainant on said date as per BBA. NAVDEEP KAUR BOPARAI V. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANOTHER, 19th March 2021 Judgment by J. Also Read- puda appeal dismissed by rera appellate tribunal punjab Facts- Dr. Navdeep Kaur … Read more
DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein court allowed refund compensation for delay. VARUN SALWAN VS M/S DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE AND OTHER The complainant had filed a case under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the opposite parties before the State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, Punjab Chandigarh. COMPLAINANT: Varun Salwan S/o Sh. … Read more
COMMERCIAL PURPOSE NOT COVERED U/S 17(1) (a) (i), CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 Judgement Digest: KUSUM KAPOOR V. M/S SPIRIT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Case Briefing: The present complaint is filed by the complainant under Section 17(1) (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act). The complainant entered into Memorandum of Understanding (in … Read more
SHAURYA TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD Consumer Complaint wherein the interest was awarded for delay in possession. RAVINDER SINGH V. SHAURYA TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD, 19th April, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Ravinder Singh v. Shaurya Township Pvt. Ltd, 19th April, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side was Sh. H.S. Gharuan … Read more
This post is about Trinity Multi State Co-operative Credit Society Consumer Complaint where it failed to provide maturity amount. Unfair Trade Practices ( Daljeet Kumar Bansal v. Trinity Multi State Co-operative Credit Society) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the Section 12 of the consumer protection Act. This analysis will provide an … Read more
Kim Infrastructure and Developers ltd. Consumer Complaint for unfair trade practice and deficiency in services. This post is a summary of judgment wherein the complainants stated that there is a deficiency and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties, firstly by collecting investments from complainants without any approval of the scheme/plan from the … Read more
Nitishree Infrastructure Consumer Complaint for Delay wherein builder failed to deliver possession within stipulated time. CASE SUMMARY: In this case the Learned counsel for the complainants has vehemently contended that the complainants were allotted flat No. E-3/404, measuring 1565 sq. ft. for basic price of Rs.21,91,000/- and Flat Buyer’s Agreement Ex.C-3 was executed between the … Read more
The post talks about Primary Estates & Developers Pvt Ltd wherein builder failed to oblige mandate of Section 18 of RERA. Thus held liable to pay interest compensation for contravention. RELIEF CLAIMED U/S18 RERA, 2016 Also Read- CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST PRIMARY ESTATES AND DEVELOPERS Judgement Digest: Sat Prakash Chauhan vs. M/s Primary Estates & Developers … Read more
Call Us