Post covers PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES Consumer Complaint Of project Hermitage park possession delayed. SUNNY DHURIA V. M.S PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES This is a suit filed before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh where the complainant filed a complaint against the respondents under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking compensation. COMPLAINANT: … Read more
Post coversTricity Home Search Builder Consumer Complaint wherein builder failed to provide possession on time. Hence Refund plus compensation. Consumer Protection act, the safeguard of the customer. Consumer Protection Act,1986 is a law to protect the interests of the consumers and provides safety to consumers regarding defective products, dissatisfactory services, and unfair trade practices. It … Read more
Post covers NDPS Section 21 Conviction Legal Advice Online wherein on what factors accused gets punishment under law & on what basis. TOPIC- Section 21 of NDPS Act (State Vs Inder Mohan) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the section 21 of the NDPS act. This analysis will provide an in-depth assimilation … Read more
Post Covers Extension of Benefit as per Bishamber Dayal High Court Chandigarh Case for grant of minimum basic pay of Group D post on completion of 20 years. Judgement Digest: Surinder Kumar S/o Sh. Hans Raj, aged 45 years, working as Sweeper (Part Time) vs. Union of India & Ors. Case Briefing: The present O.A. has … Read more
In this post we will discuss about Consumer Complaint against NH Matcon Aero homes wherein pecuniary jurisdiction was discussed. The Court held that in the present case value of the property was more than Rs.30 lacs which was much more beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Forum. When District Forum was not having jurisdiction … Read more
Post covers Consumer Case VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Judgment whereon the possession was offered after delay. Hence interest. SHYAM LAL DOGRA VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. FACTS OF THE CASE: In the complaint it has been alleged that the agreement for sale of the apartment No.744 in the project of “Gillo Palms”, sector 115, … Read more
Post covers TDI City Consumer Case for Refund of Amount wherein only symbolic possession was given sans completion certificate which is not legal as per law. Let’s read the case now. TITLE: RAJESH ARORA CASE FACTS OF THE CASE: The complainant booked a plot in the respondent’s scheme known as “TDI city”. This complaint has … Read more
Removal from Service ESIC CAT Bench Chandigarh wherein Court did not find the punishment disproportionate to charges levelled. Judgment digest CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH O.A.NO.060/00175/2020 Decided on: 24.02.2020 Also Read- CPWD Regularization Case CAT Chandigarh Bench Applicant: Santosh Kumar (Ex. UDC) (ID-145470), aged about 35 years, son of Shri Yudubir Prasad, resident of Laxmi … Read more
Post covers Restructuring Cadre PGIMER CAT Chandigarh Case to grant the relevant benefit of the recommendations of the Coordination Committee. COMPLAINT AGAINST PGIMER The applicants have sought issuance of a direction to the respondents to implement the recommendations of the Coordination Committee for restructuring of cadre of Occupational Therapist, to which the applicants belong. Also … Read more
Post covers BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein builder failed to deliver possession on time. Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against Best Builders & Developers in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and the opposite party failed to deliver possession of the unit within the … Read more
APPEAL BEFORE STATE CONSUMER COMMISSION AGAINST IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS Canam Consultants Consumer Complaint Immigration Case wherein Appeal upheld. Also Read- Navtej Singh vs Canam Consultants Ltd on 6 December, 2010 Let’s have the case here- Judgement Digest: Navtej Singh s/o S.Lal Singh resident of #3114, Sector 71, Mohalivs. Canam Consultants Ltd., SCO No.83-84, Sector 17-D,ChandigarhAlso Read- Akshay … Read more
Post covers Promotion Proposal UPSC CAT Tribunal Case wherein court ordered opinion of legal department be pursued. Rules of the promotions in UPSC There are rules and protocols that are to be followed by every department. Rules of promotions are no exceptions. Article 309 of The Indian Constitution empowers the Centre and State government to … Read more
The Post covers Limitation Rule CAT Tribunal Chandigarh Bench wherein the condonation of delay application dismissed as per rule. Limitation Period The literal meaning of the term ‘Limitation’ is a restriction or the rule or circumstances which are limited. In legal terms, there is a limit to filling a litigation and once should be vigilant … Read more
Post covers MOD CAT Chandigarh Bench Transfer Case wherein direction by the Supreme Court in the case of T.S.R. Subrmanian & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors., 2014 (1) SCT 255 Transfer policy to be considered. Case Name- Satish Kumar Vs. UOI & Ors. Also Read- CAT stays order on MES cadre review – Tribune India … Read more
Post covers Consumer Complaint Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd for deficiency in services related to defective wood work. GILCO DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS PVT. … VS AMARDEEP SINGH This post talks about an appeal filed before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab, challenging the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum dated 31.08.2012, … Read more
Post is about NAVODAYA VIDALAYA CAT Chandigarh Case wherein transfer was under challenged & applicant under suspension. NAVODAYA VIDALAYA 24.7.2020 TRANSFER CASE RAJENDRA KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. APPLICANT: Rajendra Kumar TGT Math, age 42 years, JNV Bai Nuh, Haryana, R/o H-327, Govind Puram, Ghaziabad (U.P.) RESPONDENT: Union of India through Secretary to … Read more
CGST CAT Chandigarh Case Compassionate Appointment wherein provisional compassionate appointment was suspended as applicant did not meet physical standards. Now let’s have the case here. Rest you can have the latest DOPT consolidated instructions on compassionate appointment – Replacement of Para 13-regarding dated 23.08.2021. Applicant : Sandeep Singh, age 24 years, s/o Late Sh. Paramjet … Read more
Post covers Super Time Scale CAT Chandigarh Bench Case seeking issuance of direction to the respondents to release the benefit of Super Time Scale w.e.f. 1.1.2017, when he became entitled for the same. Applicant, Sh. Sukhjit Singh Bains filed a complaint under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking issuance of direction to the … Read more
Post covers CPWD Regularization Case CAT Chandigarh Bench wherein similarly situated person were regularized. Hence the case. CAT REGULARIZATION CPWD Now let’s have the Judgment – Judgment digest Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench Date of Decision – 24th January 2020 Also Read- Surender Singh vs M/O Urban Development on 27 September, 2018 Complainant: Swaran Singh … Read more
Post covers Medical Reimbursement Claim Chandigarh CAT Bench Case citing Mohan Lal Gupta case affirmed by the Hon’ble High Court. Thus retirees are covered for reimbursement of medical expenses. Medical Reimbursement Claim of Retirees Government Employees. Now let’s have the case CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH O.A. No.60/866/2020 Date of decision: 11.11.2020 Also Read- K … Read more
Post Covers Service Extension Chandigarh CAT Bench Case wherein employee denied benefit as lapse of 2 years occurred but allowed to avail other remedy consequential benefits. BENEFIT OF EXTENSION IN SERVICE DENIED AFTER EXPIRY OF 2 YEARS TIME PERIOD Judgement Digest: Gulshan Kumar Versus Chandigarh Administration and others. Also Read- Extension in Service Case High … Read more
Post covers grant the benefit of 3rd ACP to the applicant in the grade pay of Rs.3000/- on completion of 14 years of regular service. Grant 3rd ACP Chandigarh CAT Bench Tribunal Case. Now let’s have the case. Also Read- Service Matter Related MACP Scheme Legal Advice FACTS OF THE CASE: The applicant works as … Read more
The post covers Res Judicata in CAT Tribunal Chandigarh Case wherein OA was dismissed on the ground of delay and laches, & res-judicata as well. The application was filed for upgradation of pay. Topic- RES JUDICATA U/S 21 ATA, 1985 Judgement Digest: Dilbagh Singh vs. Union of India & Ors. Case Briefing: Applicant had been … Read more
The post covers Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case whereon possession was not delivered on time & court allowed refund with interest plus compensation for delay. The applicant bought a residential penthouse in the opposite party’s housing scheme. For the payments the applicant took 35 lacs loan from the Punjab Bank and paid the amount … Read more
The post covers Pension Refixation Case CAT Chandigarh wherein court dismissed on ground of limitation & merit as amended rules were for in service officials not retired. The pay commission doesn’t only affect the salary, it also affects the pension. In this case study, the applicant sought for change of his pension based on various … Read more
The post covers SBI General Insurance Consumer Complaint wherein policy not renewed on time as reminder not sent & appeal filed against District Forum Order. Consumer Appeal against State Bank of India General Insurance Company Ltd. and others. This post is a summary of a judgement wherein consumer appeal was preferred against the decision of … Read more
Service Extension CAT Chandigarh Bench Case wherein court ordered to decide representation against UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION . RANJNA KHOSLA V. UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION THROUGH ADVISOR TO ADMINSTRATOR, U.T. SECRETARIAT CHANDIGARH, 23rd December, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Ranjna Khosla v. union territory Chandigarh administration and others, 23rd … Read more
CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein refund of payment allowed with interest SBI MCLR +2%.
JUDGEMENT SUMMARY of Complaint before RERA Punjab Authority against CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint
HARISH MINOCHA V. CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 7th July, 2020
Today we are going to talk about the case of Harish Minocha v. Chandigarh overseas Pvt. Ltd., 7th July, 2020. The advocate for the complainant side was Ms. Banni Chibbar and for the respondent side was ex- parte.
WWICS Immigration Consultancy Consumer Complaint wherein the refund was allowed from court with interest for not delivering on promise. Let’s have the judgment here- SONAM SEHGAL V. WORLDWIDE IMMIGRATION CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT. LTD., 30th July, 2018 Today we are going to talk about the case of Sonam Sehgal v. WWICS (worldwide immigration consultancy services Pvt. … Read more
Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund for refund for delay as possession not delivered on time to buyer. Let us have the judgment where refund was allowed along with compensation and litigation cost for mental harassment and agony. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Acme Builders Pvt. Ltd. Judgment digest: STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., … Read more
HOUSE ACCOMODATION CASE CHANDIGARH CAT TRIBUNAL finds no reason for interfering in the executive order cancelling her Government accommodation. PRITI MALHOTRA v. ADMINISTRATOR AND ORS. The post discusses the original petition filed by the applicant, Priti Malhotra, before the Central Administrative Tribunal, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 26.05.2020, 28.05.2020 and 04.08.02020, where the … Read more
Post covers GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB regarding plots in ECO City where ‘R’ category plots were for residents of Punjab only. CHETNA SRIVASTAVA VS GMADA This post talks about filed this complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred as Ops) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the … Read more
Post Covers Consumer Complaint Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. wherein possession not delivered within 1 year. Refund granted by court plus compensation. The excerpts taken from Case Title- Kiran Singh vs Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Private Ltd. In CC/395/2017 decided on 16.3.2018. Introduction- Version of Complainant Complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite … Read more
Post covers Extension in Service Case High Court Chandigarh The policy granting extension to the employees has since been scrapped by the Punjab Government Case- SURESH KUMAR VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS The petitioner, Suresh Kumar, filed a civil writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, under article 226/227 of the … Read more
This post covers Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd Wherein court granted compensation for delay in possession. Gurdev Kaur Thind vs Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. on 21 December, 2020 Complaint case No: 15 of 2020Date of Institution: 08.01.2020Date of Decision: 21.12.2020 FACTS OF THE CASE: It is the case of the complainant that despite receiving … Read more
ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD project namely Premium Homes in Gulmohar Valley Lalru where refund granted for delay. HEMLATA v. ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD COMPLAINANT: Hemlata, wife of Kuldeep Singh Kuldeep Singh, son. Of Sh. Sham Singh OPPOSITE PARTIES: Allied Infrazone & Developers Pvt. Ltd Syed Hussain Shanaz, The Director, Allied Infrazone … Read more
This post covers Interest on Delay in Gratuity Payment CAT Case where court found delay unusual & was a case of Voluntary retirement. Hence no merit. Delay in Gratuity – Education Department Payment (Renu Anand v. Union Territory Chandigarh) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the courts with respect … Read more
Alchemist Hospital Consumer Complaint Case wherein appeal was dismissed as no case of Medical Negligence made out. ALCHEMIST HOSPITAL VS DHARMENDRA THAKUR This post talks about a complaint filed before the State Dispute Consumer Redressal Forum, where the previously decided two appeals of this court was disposed of by the passing of the current order. … Read more
SKYRISE BUILDERS VENETIAN TOWER CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein shop not delivered on time & refund granted with interest and compensation. Case – Harvinder Singh Bedi vs Skyrise Builders on 29 January, 2018 This post is a summary of judgment wherein OP floated a scheme for allotment of shops/showrooms/office space/food courts under the name and style of Skyrise … Read more
Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein refund allowed to complainant along with compensation and interest for delay. Case- Anjali Dogra And Ors v. Emerging Valley (p) Ltd. And Ors Judgment digest STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH Complaint case No.: 80 of 2019 Date of Institution: 10.04.2019 Date of Decision: 04.01.2021 Complainant: Anjali … Read more
TDI Infracorp State Commission Haryana Complaint JUDGEMENT SUMMARY GIAN DEVI V. T.D.I. INFRACORP LTD, 12th September, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Gian Devi v. T.D.I. Infracorp Ltd, 12th September, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side were J.P. Chaudhary and for the respondent (opposite party) Shri. Ajay Ghangas the … Read more
RERA Panchkula Case against Omaxe Pvt Ltd wherein interest with compensation awarded for Delay. Let us have the case here titled as: MADAN LAL MUTNEJA V. M/s OMAXE PVT. LTD., 28th April, 2021 Omaxe Pvt Ltd Haryana RERA Panchkula Case Today we are going to talk about the case of Madan Lal Mutneja v. M/s … Read more
Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint wherein refund of amount was allowed for delay in possession. SUBHASH MALIK v. SUNCITY BUILDERS Pvt. LTD. A complaint was filed by the complainant, Subhash Malik, against the respondent, Suncity Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., to refund the amount paid by the complainant as the respondent had failed to make the … Read more
Transfer of Investigation Case High Court Chandigarh must insist establish and prove them from the facts and circumstances to the satisfaction of the court JUDGEMENT SUMMARY GAUR GURPREET V. STATE OF PUNJAB, 12th August, 2013 Also Read- Punjab Haryana High Court Chandigarh Today we are going to talk about the case of Gaur Gurpreet v. … Read more
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Complaint for Refund wherein refund was allowed for delay in possession. ALKA KHERA VS M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION By stating the act and conduct of the opposite parties, under section 17 of the consumer Protection Act, 1986, it is said to amount to deficiency in providing service and adoption of unfair trade … Read more
AMAZING REAL ESTATE PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein cancellation unit was under challenge by Builder. SAPNA V. M/S AMAZING REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD, 12th October, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Sapna v. M/s Amazing Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, 12th October, 2020. The advocates for the complainant side was Shri. Varun … Read more
Future City Developers Punjab RERA Complaint wherein mutual settlement was arrived with complainants for removing deficiencies. JUDGEMENT SUMMARY SAURABH KHANNA V. M/S FUTURE CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD, 26th June, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Saurabh Khanna v. Future City Developers Pvt . ltd, 26th June, 2020. The advocates for … Read more
The post Gateway City PUDA Consumer Complaint Case covers compensation for delay in possession to complainant on said date as per BBA. NAVDEEP KAUR BOPARAI V. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANOTHER, 19th March 2021 Judgment by J. Also Read- puda appeal dismissed by rera appellate tribunal punjab Facts- Dr. Navdeep Kaur … Read more
DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein court allowed refund compensation for delay. VARUN SALWAN VS M/S DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE AND OTHER The complainant had filed a case under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the opposite parties before the State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, Punjab Chandigarh. COMPLAINANT: Varun Salwan S/o Sh. … Read more
NON-FUNCTIONAL UPGRADATION CAT Chandigarh Case while relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M. Subramaniam (supra). Judgement Digest: Virender Singh Versus Union of India & Ors. Case Briefing: The present O.A. has been filed by the applicant for grant of Non-Functional Upgradation in the Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- w.e.f. … Read more
Call Us