HRERA Panchkula Dismisses Refund Claim in La Dimora City Project: Complaint Held Premature In a recent ruling, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority Panchkula dismissed a homebuyer’s complaint seeking refund, holding that the claim was premature in light of the contractual terms agreed between the parties. Background of the Case The complaint was filed by … Read more
Vatika Limited HighCourt Ruling on RERA Execution wherein Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Haryana Government Notification Granting Collector Powers to HRERA Adjudicating Officer. Vatika Limited HighCourt Ruling In an important decision affecting the enforcement mechanism under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), the Punjab & Haryana High Court set aside a … Read more
HREAT: Promoter Must Disclose Bank Accounts & Assets for RERA Execution Haryana In a significant ruling strengthening homebuyers’ rights, the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has held that a promoter cannot evade payment of a RERA refund order by withholding asset details. The Tribunal directed that the promoter must file a sworn affidavit disclosing complete … Read more
This post covers RERA Appeal High Court Chandigarh Panchkula Gurugram wherein after RERA Appellate Tribunal Order of Panchkula Gurugram Authority is challenged. After RERA Panchkula-RERA Gurugram order, first Appeal lies to Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal and of RERA Punjab Authority to Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Punjab under Section 44 of the Real Estate (Regulation … Read more
Post covers recent ruling of RERA Panchkula’s Adjudicating Officer (AO) wherein the compensation has been denied to Subsequent Allottee but though the refund and interest already stood granted to him by RERA Authority when the complaint was filed for compensation separately. It simply says NO RERA COMPENSATION FOR SUBSEQUENT ALLOTTEE- AO PANCHKULA. A “subsequent allottee,” … Read more
Post covers Caveat Before RERA Appellate Tribunal Haryana against the orders of HRERA Panchkula and HRERA Gurugram whenever in Appeal. Caveat is basically a remedy in law available to both the parties in lis that whenever appeal is preferred by either of them, it is the bounden duty of court to inform the other party … Read more
Post covers Arrest Showcause Notice Penalty In Rera Executions. Can builder be arrested under RERA via showcause Notice or Section 63 Penalty is discussed in detailed. According to Section 63 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the promoter of a project is liable to pay a penalty of up to 5% of … Read more
This post covers RERA Appellate Tribunal Himachal Pradesh at Chandigarh where appeals from Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HPRERA) Shimla are being heard. The HPRERA Appellate Tribunal for Himachal Pradesh, authorized to hear appeals against RERA Himachal orders, is located in Chandigarh at SCO 50-51, Sector 17-A/D. Appeals regarding Himachal RERA decisions are processed at this location, … Read more
Chandigarh UT do have RERA Authority like RERA Punjab Authority and Haryana RERA Panchkula Authority but not that active since there is dearth of Real Estate Projects in Chandigarh. Experienced RERA lawyers in Chandigarh provide legal advisory and representation for property disputes, builder complaints, and developer registration under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016. … Read more
Complaints against ATS Golf Meadows Lifestyle in Dera Bassi, Punjab, primarily involve significant delays in handing over possession, lack of completion certificates, and incomplete amenities. Punjab RERA has frequently ordered refunds with interest (often over 10-11%) to buyers due to breaches of the buyer agreement. Key Complaint Issues: Delayed Possession: Projects missed promised completion dates (often within 42–48 months), … Read more
Complaints against Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd. (RERA Reg No: PBRERA-SAS80-PR0242) in Punjab RERA often involve delays in possession at projects near Kharar-Landran Road, Mohali. RERA has handled multiple complaints (e.g., GCNo.13762019) involving settlement deeds and, in some cases, instructed the builder to provide interest for delayed possession. Key Aspects of RERA Complaints in Punjab: Common … Read more
Complaints against Maya Garden City (Barnala Builders) in Zirakpur often involve delays in possession, lack of completion certificates, and unfulfilled promised returns. RERA Punjab has directed the builder in several cases to pay interest for delayed possession, compensate for mental agony, or refund amounts, with some complaints highlighting issues in both residential and commercial units. … Read more
Complaints against Tulip Infratech in Haryana RERA often relate to project delays, failure to deliver possession, and non-compliance with quarterly progress report submissions. Numerous cases, including suo-motu actions (e.g., Complaint No. 1998 of 2022, 5232-2019), have been registered by HRERA Panchkula/Gurugram regarding violations of Section 11 of the RERA Act, 2016. In this post we will … Read more
In this post we will discuss about the detailed procedure for getting back the mandatory deposit amount required for filing an appeal in HREAT. How to get refund of the amount deposited by the Appellant with the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal Once the impugned order is held to be without jurisdiction and appeal filed … Read more
For appeals to the RERA Punjab Appellate Tribunal, the primary limitation is 60 days from receiving the Authority’s order, but the Tribunal can condone delays if “sufficient cause” is shown, often requiring a formal condonation of delay application with the appeal. Appeals must follow specific forms (Form ‘L’ for Punjab), include required documents, fees (e.g., Rs. 1000 DD), and … Read more
Under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016, a promoter must deposit at least 30% of the penalty or the total amount ordered (including interest/compensation) before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal can hear an appeal. This mandatory pre-deposit ensures buyer protection and verifies the promoter’s bona fides. This report looks into a judgment of Punjab … Read more
Complaints against Sushma Buildtech Limited, primarily regarding project delays (e.g., Sushma Crescent, Infinium) and demands for interest or refunds, are commonly filed with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Punjab. RERA Punjab has handled numerous cases, with some resulting in directives for interest payments for delayed possession (e.g., 9.3% rate) or dismissals due to settlements or … Read more
This post covers RERA Punjab Complaint against ATS Estate Private Ltd before Adjudicating Officer wherein the refund of entire amount was allowed along with interest & further compensation for delay in possession on account of mental agony, pain and harassment. RERA Punjab Authorities are strict for builder for defying possessions timeline where customer suffers for … Read more
This post covers judgment of Haryana RERA Panchkula Complaint against TDI Infrastructure wherein complainant sought refund of money from the project along with interest and delay compensation on account of non-timely delivery of possession. The relief of refund of relief was not accepted but interest of account of delay was awarded to the complainant. The … Read more
Post Covers RERA Punjab Complaint against Country Colonizers Private Limited for delay in possession and getting monthly interest from the builder till valid legal offer of possession is made. In this post, we bring you a judgment digest of a case of Punjab RERA Complaint against Country Colonizers Private Limited for delay in possession and … Read more
Post covers powers of Adjudicating Officer RERA (AO) at Panchkula Haryana RERA Authority and Punjab RERA. Sole claims of compensation entertained after Newtech judgment and refund-interest prayer not to be nixed. Due to the rapid growth of the Indian economy and the continuous migration of people from rural to urban areas, the need of housing … Read more
Post is about forfeiture by builder of earnest amount while buying a unit in any project and what is the RERA rule regarding it. Let’s read. There are many instances where Builders unilaterally cancel the allotment of unit and forfeit the money of home buyer. The said practise of Builders has been done to cover … Read more
Post covers quick facts RERA about Haryana Panchkula Authority and Punjab Authority at Chandigarh. Here in this post, we will cover quick facts about Haryana RERA Panchkula Authority and Punjab RERA Authority at Chandigarh. Both these authorities are working stead fast to solve the problems of homebuyers in the region be it delay in possession, … Read more
Yes, the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (PUDA) has had multiple appeals dismissed by the RERA Appellate Tribunal (REAT) in Punjab, often for failing to provide valid reasons for delays in project possession, not proving completion, or for procedural failures, leading to homebuyers getting refunds with interest. The tribunal consistently rules against PUDA when … Read more
Call Us