Removal from Service ESIC CAT Bench Chandigarh wherein Court did not find the punishment disproportionate to charges levelled. Judgment digest CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH O.A.NO.060/00175/2020 Decided on: 24.02.2020 Also Read- CPWD Regularization Case CAT Chandigarh Bench Applicant: Santosh Kumar (Ex. UDC) (ID-145470), aged about 35 years, son of Shri Yudubir Prasad, resident of Laxmi … Read more
Post covers Restructuring Cadre PGIMER CAT Chandigarh Case to grant the relevant benefit of the recommendations of the Coordination Committee. COMPLAINT AGAINST PGIMER The applicants have sought issuance of a direction to the respondents to implement the recommendations of the Coordination Committee for restructuring of cadre of Occupational Therapist, to which the applicants belong. Also … Read more
Post covers BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein builder failed to deliver possession on time. Bringing you the case Digest on consumer complaint against Best Builders & Developers in State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh. Wherein consumer purchased a unit and the opposite party failed to deliver possession of the unit within the … Read more
APPEAL BEFORE STATE CONSUMER COMMISSION AGAINST IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS Canam Consultants Consumer Complaint Immigration Case wherein Appeal upheld.  Also Read- Navtej Singh vs Canam Consultants Ltd on 6 December, 2010 Let’s have the case here- Judgement Digest: Navtej Singh s/o S.Lal Singh resident of #3114, Sector 71, Mohalivs. Canam Consultants Ltd., SCO No.83-84, Sector 17-D,ChandigarhAlso Read- Akshay … Read more
Post covers Promotion Proposal UPSC CAT Tribunal Case wherein court ordered opinion of legal department be pursued. Rules of the promotions in UPSC There are rules and protocols that are to be followed by every department. Rules of promotions are no exceptions. Article 309 of The Indian Constitution empowers the Centre and State government to … Read more
The Post covers Limitation Rule CAT Tribunal Chandigarh Bench wherein the condonation of delay application dismissed as per rule. Limitation Period The literal meaning of the term ‘Limitation’ is a restriction or the rule or circumstances which are limited. In legal terms, there is a limit to filling a litigation and once should be vigilant … Read more
Post covers MOD CAT Chandigarh Bench Transfer Case wherein direction by the Supreme Court in the case of T.S.R. Subrmanian & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors., 2014 (1) SCT 255 Transfer policy to be considered. Case Name- Satish Kumar Vs. UOI & Ors. Also Read- CAT stays order on MES cadre review – Tribune India … Read more
Post covers Consumer Complaint Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd for deficiency in services related to defective wood work. GILCO DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS PVT. … VS AMARDEEP SINGH This post talks about an appeal filed before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab, challenging the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum dated 31.08.2012, … Read more
Post is about NAVODAYA VIDALAYA CAT Chandigarh Case wherein transfer was under challenged & applicant under suspension. NAVODAYA VIDALAYA 24.7.2020 TRANSFER CASE RAJENDRA KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. APPLICANT: Rajendra Kumar TGT Math, age 42 years, JNV Bai Nuh, Haryana, R/o H-327, Govind Puram, Ghaziabad (U.P.) RESPONDENT: Union of India through Secretary to … Read more
CGST CAT Chandigarh Case Compassionate Appointment wherein provisional compassionate appointment was suspended as applicant did not meet physical standards. Now let’s have the case here. Rest you can have the latest DOPT consolidated instructions on compassionate appointment – Replacement of Para 13-regarding dated 23.08.2021. Applicant : Sandeep Singh, age 24 years, s/o Late Sh. Paramjet … Read more
Post covers Super Time Scale CAT Chandigarh Bench Case seeking issuance of direction to the respondents to release the benefit of Super Time Scale w.e.f. 1.1.2017, when he became entitled for the same. Applicant, Sh. Sukhjit Singh Bains filed a complaint under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking issuance of direction to the … Read more
Post covers CPWD Regularization Case CAT Chandigarh Bench wherein similarly situated person were regularized. Hence the case. CAT REGULARIZATION CPWD Now let’s have the Judgment – Judgment digest Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench Date of Decision – 24th January 2020 Also Read- Surender Singh vs M/O Urban Development on 27 September, 2018 Complainant: Swaran Singh … Read more
Post covers Medical Reimbursement Claim Chandigarh CAT Bench Case citing Mohan Lal Gupta case affirmed by the Hon’ble High Court. Thus retirees are covered for reimbursement of medical expenses. Medical Reimbursement Claim of Retirees Government Employees. Now let’s have the case CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH O.A. No.60/866/2020 Date of decision: 11.11.2020 Also Read- K … Read more
Post Covers Service Extension Chandigarh CAT Bench Case wherein employee denied benefit as lapse of 2 years occurred but allowed to avail other remedy consequential benefits. BENEFIT OF EXTENSION IN SERVICE DENIED AFTER EXPIRY OF 2 YEARS TIME PERIOD Judgement Digest: Gulshan Kumar Versus Chandigarh Administration and others. Also Read- Extension in Service Case High … Read more
Post covers grant the benefit of 3rd ACP to the applicant in the grade pay of Rs.3000/- on completion of 14 years of regular service. Grant 3rd ACP Chandigarh CAT Bench Tribunal Case. Now let’s have the case. Also Read- Service Matter Related MACP Scheme Legal Advice FACTS OF THE CASE: The applicant works as … Read more
This post is a summary of judgment wherein the applicant submitted that the representation seeking issuance of CGHS card to avail indoor medical facilities, as claimed in the present O.A, is pending consideration with the Competent Authority. He suffered a statement that he would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider … Read more
The post covers Res Judicata in CAT Tribunal Chandigarh Case wherein OA was dismissed on the ground of delay and laches, & res-judicata as well. The application was filed for upgradation of pay. Topic- RES JUDICATA U/S 21 ATA, 1985 Judgement Digest: Dilbagh Singh vs. Union of India & Ors. Case Briefing: Applicant had been … Read more
The post covers Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case whereon possession was not delivered on time & court allowed refund with interest plus compensation for delay. The applicant bought a residential penthouse in the opposite party’s housing scheme. For the payments the applicant took 35 lacs loan from the Punjab Bank and paid the amount … Read more
The post covers Pension Refixation Case CAT Chandigarh wherein court dismissed on ground of limitation & merit as amended rules were for in service officials not retired. The pay commission doesn’t only affect the salary, it also affects the pension. In this case study, the applicant sought for change of his pension based on various … Read more
The post covers SBI General Insurance Consumer Complaint wherein policy not renewed on time as reminder not sent & appeal filed against District Forum Order. Consumer Appeal against State Bank of India General Insurance Company Ltd. and others. This post is a summary of a judgement wherein consumer appeal was preferred against the decision of … Read more
Service Extension CAT Chandigarh Bench Case wherein court ordered to decide representation against UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION . RANJNA KHOSLA V. UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION THROUGH ADVISOR TO ADMINSTRATOR, U.T. SECRETARIAT CHANDIGARH, 23rd December, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Ranjna Khosla v. union territory Chandigarh administration and others, 23rd … Read more
CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein refund of payment allowed with interest SBI MCLR +2%. JUDGEMENT SUMMARY of Complaint before RERA Punjab Authority against CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint HARISH MINOCHA V. CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 7th July, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Harish Minocha v. Chandigarh … Read more
WWICS Immigration Consultancy Consumer Complaint wherein the refund was allowed from court with interest for not delivering on promise. Let’s have the judgment here- SONAM SEHGAL V. WORLDWIDE IMMIGRATION CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT. LTD., 30th July, 2018 Today we are going to talk about the case of Sonam Sehgal v. WWICS (worldwide immigration consultancy services Pvt. … Read more
Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund for refund for delay as possession not delivered on time to buyer. Let us have the judgment where refund was allowed along with compensation and litigation cost for mental harassment and agony. CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Acme Builders Pvt. Ltd. Judgment digest: STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., … Read more
HOUSE ACCOMODATION CASE CHANDIGARH CAT TRIBUNAL finds no reason for interfering in the executive order cancelling her Government accommodation. PRITI MALHOTRA v. ADMINISTRATOR AND ORS. The post discusses the original petition filed by the applicant, Priti Malhotra, before the Central Administrative Tribunal, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 26.05.2020, 28.05.2020 and 04.08.02020, where the … Read more
Post covers GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB regarding plots in ECO City where ‘R’ category plots were for residents of Punjab only. CHETNA SRIVASTAVA VS GMADA This post talks about filed this complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred as Ops) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the … Read more
Post Covers Consumer Complaint Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. wherein possession not delivered within 1 year. Refund granted by court plus compensation. The excerpts taken from Case Title- Kiran Singh vs Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Private Ltd. In CC/395/2017 decided on 16.3.2018. Introduction- Version of Complainant Complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite … Read more
This post covers Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd Wherein court granted compensation for delay in possession. Gurdev Kaur Thind vs Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. on 21 December, 2020 Complaint case No: Â 15 of 2020Date of Institution: 08.01.2020Date of Decision: 21.12.2020Â FACTS OF THE CASE: It is the case of the complainant that despite receiving … Read more
ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD project namely Premium Homes in Gulmohar Valley Lalru where refund granted for delay. HEMLATA v. ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD COMPLAINANT: Hemlata, wife of Kuldeep Singh Kuldeep Singh, son. Of Sh. Sham Singh OPPOSITE PARTIES: Allied Infrazone & Developers Pvt. Ltd Syed Hussain Shanaz, The Director, Allied Infrazone … Read more
This post covers Interest on Delay in Gratuity Payment CAT Case where court found delay unusual & was a case of Voluntary retirement. Hence no merit. Delay in Gratuity – Education Department Payment (Renu Anand v. Union Territory Chandigarh) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the courts with respect … Read more
Alchemist Hospital Consumer Complaint Case wherein appeal was dismissed as no case of Medical Negligence made out. ALCHEMIST HOSPITAL VS DHARMENDRA THAKUR This post talks about a complaint filed before the State Dispute Consumer Redressal Forum, where the previously decided two appeals of this court was disposed of by the passing of the current order. … Read more
SKYRISE BUILDERS VENETIAN TOWER CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein shop not delivered on time & refund granted with interest and compensation. Case – Harvinder Singh Bedi vs Skyrise Builders on 29 January, 2018 This post is a summary of judgment wherein OP floated a scheme for allotment of shops/showrooms/office space/food courts under the name and style of Skyrise … Read more
Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein refund allowed to complainant along with compensation and interest for delay. Case- Anjali Dogra And Ors v. Emerging Valley (p) Ltd. And Ors Judgment digest STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH Complaint case No.: 80 of 2019 Date of Institution: 10.04.2019 Date of Decision: 04.01.2021 Complainant: Anjali … Read more
TDI Infracorp State Commission Haryana Complaint JUDGEMENT SUMMARY GIAN DEVI V. T.D.I. INFRACORP LTD, 12th September, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Gian Devi v. T.D.I. Infracorp Ltd, 12th September, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side were J.P. Chaudhary and for the respondent (opposite party) Shri. Ajay Ghangas the … Read more
Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint wherein refund of amount was allowed for delay in possession. SUBHASH MALIK v. SUNCITY BUILDERS Pvt. LTD. Â A complaint was filed by the complainant, Subhash Malik, against the respondent, Suncity Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., to refund the amount paid by the complainant as the respondent had failed to make the … Read more
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Complaint for Refund wherein refund was allowed for delay in possession. ALKA KHERA VS M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION By stating the act and conduct of the opposite parties, under section 17 of the consumer Protection Act, 1986, it is said to amount to deficiency in providing service and adoption of unfair trade … Read more
AMAZING REAL ESTATE PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein cancellation unit was under challenge by Builder. SAPNA V. M/S AMAZING REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD, 12th October, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Sapna v. M/s Amazing Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, 12th October, 2020. The advocates for the complainant side was Shri. Varun … Read more
Future City Developers Punjab RERA Complaint wherein mutual settlement was arrived with complainants for removing deficiencies. JUDGEMENT SUMMARY SAURABH KHANNA V. M/S FUTURE CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD, 26th June, 2020 Today we are going to talk about the case of Saurabh Khanna v. Future City Developers Pvt . ltd, 26th June, 2020. The advocates for … Read more
The post Gateway City PUDA Consumer Complaint Case covers compensation for delay in possession to complainant on said date as per BBA. NAVDEEP KAUR BOPARAI V. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANOTHER, 19th March 2021 Judgment by J. Also Read- puda appeal dismissed by rera appellate tribunal punjab Facts- Dr. Navdeep Kaur … Read more
DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT wherein court allowed refund compensation for delay. VARUN SALWAN VS M/S DIGVIJAY REAL ESTATE AND OTHER The complainant had filed a case under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the opposite parties before the State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, Punjab Chandigarh. COMPLAINANT: Varun Salwan S/o Sh. … Read more
NON-FUNCTIONAL UPGRADATION CAT Chandigarh Case while relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M. Subramaniam (supra). Judgement Digest: Virender Singh Versus Union of India & Ors. Case Briefing: The present O.A. has been filed by the applicant for grant of Non-Functional Upgradation in the Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- w.e.f. … Read more
Benefit of notional increment purely for pensionary purpose and no other benefit. IB Notional Increment 23.9,2020 after retirement The case study is regarding the large number of cases of notional increment for pensionary benefits to those Central government servants who have retired on 30th June. The case of P. Ayyamperumal Vs Registrar played an important … Read more
TOPIC- Retiral Dues (Sham Singh v. Govt. Of India through Secretary) Through this analysis, the author will try to understand the power of the court with respect to issuing orders guiding the functioning of other authorities. This analysis will provide an in-depth assimilation of the extent of the power the courts enjoy in such cases. … Read more
CAT Chandigarh RAILWAY Compassionate APPOINMENT CASE wherein medical examination, the applicant was declared medically unfit due to low vision. Also Read- PGIMER NURSING OFFICER CASE CAT Tribunal Chandigarh FACTS OF THE CASE The applicant’s father who was a loco-pilot Gr.I in the respondents office expired in August 2019 while in service. Thereafter, the applicant applied … Read more
Family Pension Case CAT Tribunal Chandigarh wherein applicant seeks similar relief in terms of Principal Bench of C.A.T titles Renu Gupta v. UOI etc. decided on 10/09/2018. YOGESH DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. APPLICANT: Yogesh Devi W/o Om Parkash aged 57 years, R/o House No. 491, Sector 29-A, Chandigarh-160030, Group-C. RESPONDENT: Union of … Read more
COMMERCIAL PURPOSE NOT COVERED U/S 17(1) (a) (i), CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 Judgement Digest: KUSUM KAPOOR V. M/S SPIRIT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Case Briefing: The present complaint is filed by the complainant under Section 17(1) (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act). The complainant entered into Memorandum of Understanding (in … Read more
Medical Charges Government Retired Employees CAT Case wherein court answered whether they are entitled for reimbursement. DHARAM PAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. The petition was filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh bench, where the applicant challenged the impugned order which was rejected for the reimbursement of his medical charges on the plea … Read more
SHAURYA TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD Consumer Complaint wherein the interest was awarded for delay in possession. RAVINDER SINGH V. SHAURYA TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD, 19th April, 2017 Today we are going to talk about the case of Ravinder Singh v. Shaurya Township Pvt. Ltd, 19th April, 2017. The advocates for the complainant side was Sh. H.S. Gharuan … Read more
Property dispute case wherein appointment of local commissioner was challenged before High Court Chandigarh. Review Petition under Art 227 Art 22 of Indian Constitution, empowers the High Courts to have superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction, except a court formed under a law related to … Read more
The applicants were the aspirant of the B.Sc. Nursing and wanted to take admission in NINE. As per the advertisement by the respondent regarding the Nursing Officer, they were appointed by back door and not by open competition which is illegal. The applicant sought the complaint that the Fundamental Rights of the applicant. The respondent’s … Read more
Call Us