Lightstone Developers La Dimora City Complaint

La Dimora City Complaint

HRERA Panchkula Dismisses Refund Claim in La Dimora City Project: Complaint Held Premature In a recent ruling, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority Panchkula dismissed a homebuyer’s complaint seeking refund, holding that the claim was premature in light of the contractual terms agreed between the parties. Background of the Case The complaint was filed by … Read more

Marbella Grand Complaint RERA Punjab Authority

Marbella Grand Complaint RERA Punjab Authority

  RERA Punjab Authority Grants Interest for Delayed Possession in Marbella Grand Project in a recent complaint before it. In a significant ruling dated 13 March 2026, the Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) held the developer SRG Developers & Promoters liable for delay in handing over possession and directed payment of interest to the … Read more

HLP Infratech Palmillas Punjab RERA Complaint

HLP Infratech Palmillas Punjab RERA Complaint

RERA Punjab Orders Interest for Delay in Possession: Builder Held Liable Despite Completion Claim in HLP Infratech Palmillas Zirakpur Complaint. Complaints against HLP Infratech’s “HLP Palmillas” project in Zirakpur, Punjab, have been filed with Punjab RERA, primarily regarding delays in handing over possession of residential plots (e.g., agreed possession dates in 2023 not met). Complainants … Read more

Compensation for Delay Possession-Supreme Court’s Latest

Supreme Court’s latest on Compensation for Delay Possession

Supreme Court Upholds 8% Interest as Compensation for Delay Possession: Builders Cannot Hide Behind One-Sided Clauses In a significant judgment dated 20 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India dismissed multiple appeals filed by Parsvnath Developers Ltd. and reaffirmed a crucial principle: Consumer fora can award fair and reasonable compensation despite restrictive clauses in builder-buyer … Read more

NO RERA COMPENSATION FOR SUBSEQUENT ALLOTTEE- AO PANCHKULA

RERA SUBSEQUENT ALLOTTEE

Post covers recent ruling of RERA Panchkula’s Adjudicating Officer (AO) wherein the compensation has been denied to Subsequent Allottee but though the refund and interest already stood granted to him by RERA Authority when the complaint was filed for compensation separately. It simply says NO RERA COMPENSATION FOR SUBSEQUENT ALLOTTEE- AO PANCHKULA.  A “subsequent allottee,” … Read more

ARREST SHOWCAUSE NOTICE PENALTY RERA EXECUTION

ARREST SHOWCAUSE NOTICE PENALTY IN RERA EXECUTIONS

Post covers Arrest Showcause Notice Penalty In Rera Executions. Can builder be arrested under RERA via showcause Notice or Section 63 Penalty is discussed in detailed. According to Section 63 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the promoter of a project is liable to pay a penalty of up to 5% of … Read more

ATS Estates Complaint in Consumer Court

ATS Estates Complaint in Consumer Court.

This case talks about ATS Estates Complaint in Consumer Court wherein refund was allowed to homebuyer. Assuring More Powers to Customers In this case, we will talk about how State Commission asserted more power to the customers and made customer believe that there is a watchman who is safeguarding their interest during unfair practice. The … Read more

Express Project Pvt. Ltd RERA Panchkula Complaint

Express Project Pvt. Ltd RERA Panchkula Complaint

This post covers Express Project Pvt. Ltd RERA Panchkula Complaint wherein the main contention was maintenance charges being levied arbitrarily extra. INTRODUCTION   In 2016 , Real Estate (Regional and Development) Act was introduced by the government of India with the aim to regulate the real estate industry and bring transparency and accountability that would protect … Read more

BHATINDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONSUMER CASE

BHATINDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONSUMER CASE

The applicant filed an application for the delay of condonation due to the technical error by the bank. Facts of the case revolves with the possession. After listening to the both sides of the court held that the contention of the opposite party is not applicable and the complainant is entitled to the refund policy. … Read more

Consumer Complaint against Hero Reality Pvt. Ltd.

Consumer Complaint against Hero Reality Pvt. Ltd.

This post covers Consumer Complaint against Hero Reality Pvt. Ltd. In state consumer commission wherein the forfeiture of amount is justified by court. Importance of the signed application This case study will focus on how the state commission gave importance to the obligation of the complainant which it is supposed to fulfil. The commission gave … Read more

Reliant Infrastructure Private Ltd Consumer Complaint

Reliant Infrastructure Private Ltd Consumer Complaint

This post covers Reliant Infrastructure Private Consumer Complaint when Interest follows when there is an order for refund. When a court orders a refund on the amount paid by a party, the party’s right to ask for interest follows. This is a settled law which was held by Honourable Supreme Court, and in this case … Read more

Consumer Complaint Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd

Consumer Complaint Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd

This post covers Consumer Complaint Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd wherein complainant asked to clear dues.  Tajinder Kumar Sharma & Anr. Vs. M/s. Future City Developers Pvt. Ltd. The present post will cover and give an overview of the case and it will give you a brief yet precise outline regarding all the major facts … Read more

Appeal Against TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Appeal Against TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

This case covers QUASHING THE APPEAL  TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS v. ADITYA TOMAR against State Commission order. The present post will cover and give an overview of the case and it will give you a brief yet precise outline regarding all the major facts and issues involved in this particular case which basically … Read more

Marvel Homes Construction Consumer Complaint

Marvel Homes Construction Consumer Complaint

This post covers Marvel Homes Construction Consumer Complaint for deficiency of services. Dial 99888-17966 to know more. Sheenu vs M/S Marvel Homes Construction on 17 May, 2018 Date of Institution: 29.09.2017 Date of Reserve: 30.04.2018 Date of Decision: 17.05.2018 Also Read- Sheenu vs M/S Marvel Homes Construction … on 17 May, 2018 FACTS OF THE … Read more

HERO REALITY PRIVATE LTD Punjab RERA Complaint

HERO REALITY PRIVATE LTD Punjab RERA Complaint

This post covers RERA Punjab Complaint against of HERO REALITY PRIVATE LTD where refund was sought with interest & Litigation expenses. Case Title- KAPIL TADON Vs. HERO REALITY PRIVATE LTD Also Read- Open Forum about Hero Homes, Mohali – Commonfloor.com FACTS OF THE CASE: Kapil Tandon who is also referred to as the complainant has … Read more

CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Dynasty Buildwell Pvt. Ltd

CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST Dynasty Buildwell Pvt. Ltd

This post is a summary of judgment wherein the complainant has filed the complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the OPs on the averments that he entered into an agreement for allotment of the flat comprising of 1379 sq. ft but at the time of possession the possession of the super built … Read more

Consumer Complaint against Alpha Corp Development

Consumer Complaint against Alpha Corp Development

Consumer complaints against Alpha Corp Development Pvt. Ltd. (or Alpha G Corp) often revolve around delayed possession, maintenance fee disputes, and project jurisdiction, with several cases brought before Haryana RERA and consumer courts. Recent rulings show the company has faced penalties and orders to pay interest for delays, alongside issues with providing accurate project completion documents.  Alpha … Read more

STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB CONSUMER APPEAL- GULMOHAR VALLEY

STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB CONSUMER APPEAL- GULMOHAR VALLEY

An appeal against a Punjab District Consumer Commission order can be filed before the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission within 45 days. The appeal, covering disputes involving claims usually above ₹1 crore and up to ₹10 crore, must be filed with certified copies of the order and supporting documents.  This post covers STATE COMMISSION … Read more

Emerging Heights-III Consumer Case Judgment Digest

Emerging Heights-III Consumer Case

Consumers facing issues with Emerging Heights-III (Sector 115, Mohali) by M/s Emerging India Housing Corporation, such as delayed possession, lack of occupancy certificates, or refund requests, should file complaints with the RERA Punjab or the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Multiple cases highlight issues of non-delivery, with commissions directing the builder to refund amounts with interest. … Read more

Allotees & Re-Allottees State Consumer Commission Ruling

SJ- Allotees & Re-Allottees State Consumer Commission Ruling

Post covers Allotees & Re-Allottees definition by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission when it comes to deciding relief in delay in possession claims. Allotees & Re-Allottees Rights in Delay in Possession In this case study, we will look into how the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission enshrined the principal laid down by the Honourable Supreme … Read more

ATS Golf Meadows Refund Consumer Complaint for Delay

ATS Golf Meadows Refund Consumer Complaint for Delay

Post covers CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST M/S ATS ESTATES PVT. LTD. seeking refund for delay in possession in Golf Meadows. Punjab RERA has frequently ordered ATS Estates to refund deposits with interest (approx. 11%–12% per annum) to buyers of the “ATS Golf Meadows Lifestyle” project in Derabassi, due to significant delays in possession and lack of … Read more

ATS Golf Meadows Lifestyle RERA Punjab Complaint

ATS Gold Meadows Lifestyle RERA Punjab Complaint

Complaints against ATS Golf Meadows Lifestyle in Dera Bassi, Punjab, primarily involve significant delays in handing over possession, lack of completion certificates, and incomplete amenities. Punjab RERA has frequently ordered refunds with interest (often over 10-11%) to buyers due to breaches of the buyer agreement. Key Complaint Issues: Delayed Possession: Projects missed promised completion dates (often within 42–48 months), … Read more

CONSUMER Case AGAINST Best Zone Builders & Developers

CONSUMER Case AGAINST Best Zone Builders & Developers

Consumer cases against Best Zone Builders & Developers, primarily regarding projects in Mohali (e.g., Orchid Green), have resulted in judgments requiring refunds of deposits along with 12% annual interest. Complaints centered on failure to deliver possession and complete construction, with courts citing deficiency in service, ordering compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses.  Key Aspects … Read more

Mona City Homes Township RERA Punjab Case

Mona City Homes Township RERA Punjab Case

Post covers Delay in Possession of a Flat in Mona City Homes Township case before RERA Punjab Authority wherein Refund granted along with interest for deficiency in services. Complaints against Mona City Homes Township primarily involve delay in possession, construction halts, project discontinuation, and issues with amenities/quality, leading many allottees to file cases with RERA Punjab seeking interest for delay, refunds, or compensation for deficiencies, … Read more

Sushma Chandigarh Grand Zirakpur Consumer Case

Sushma Chandigarh Grand Zirakpur Consumer Case

Consumer cases against Sushma Chandigarh Grande, Zirakpur, primarily involve delays in handing over possession, with courts often ruling in favor of buyers by ordering refunds of paid amounts (often exceeding ₹60 lakhs) plus interest (up to 12%-15% p.a.) and compensation. Key rulings highlight developers defaulting on agreed possession timelines.  Key Aspects of Sushma Chandigarh Grande … Read more

Tricity Media Cooperative Housing Society Complaint

Tricity Media Cooperative Housing Society Complaint

Complaints against Tricity Media Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. (Mohali) typically involve failure to deliver promised plots or refund deposits, leading to litigation under the Consumer Protection Act and RERA Punjab. Numerous complainants have been granted refunds with interest (up to 12-18%), along with compensation for harassment. Key Details Regarding Complaints: Core Issues: The society failed … Read more

RERA Case After Delivery of Possession Before Authority

RERA Case After Delivery of Possession Before Authority

Yes, a RERA case can be filed even after taking possession of a property, primarily for delays in delivery, defects in construction, or deviations from the sanctioned plan. While you cannot seek a refund for delayed possession if you have already taken over the unit, you can still claim interest for the period of delay and … Read more

Consumer Complaint LAND TWISTERS for Refund Compensation

Consumer Complaint LAND TWISTERS for Refund Compensation

Complaints against Land Twisters, a real estate developer in Mohali, Punjab, primarily involve delays in project possession, failure to deliver promised amenities (like ACs, kitchens, car parks), and refund issues, leading many customers to file cases with RERA Punjab or consumer courts for refund/compensation, with some cases settling or proceeding to legal action due to … Read more

Sanskriti Group Of Companies RERA Complaint

Sanskriti Group Of Companies RERA Complaint

Multiple RERA complaints have been filed against Sanskriti Group of Companies (specifically in Punjab/Mohali) regarding delayed possession, lack of development, and demands for refund with interest. Projects like Sanskriti J Classic Residency and others have faced scrutiny for violating Section 18 of the RERA Act, leading to orders for refunds.  Key Aspects of RERA Complaints against Sanskriti Group Issues: Complaints … Read more

PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES Consumer Complaint

PARADIGM BUSINESS VENTURES Consumer Complaint

Paradigm Business Ventures has faced consumer complaints regarding real estate projects, specifically concerning delays in construction and possession of flats, despite buyers having paid a significant portion of the cost (e.g., ~72% in one case). Issues include failure to obtain timely approvals, stopping construction, and disputes over whether buyers are investors or genuine users. Key Details … Read more

Tricity Home Search Builder Consumer Complaint

Tricity Home Search Builder Consumer Complaint

Complaints against builders in the Tricity area (Chandigarh, Mohali, Panchkula), including Tricity Media Co-operative House Building Society, often involve possession delays, contractual disputes, and poor amenities. Aggrieved consumers can file complaints through the RERA Punjab authority, state consumer commissions, or the National Consumer Helpline (NCH) at 1915.  Key Avenues for Complaint in Tricity: RERA Punjab: The Real Estate Regulatory … Read more

CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST NH MATCON AERO HOMES

CONSUMER COMPLAINT AGAINST NH MATCON AERO HOMES

Numerous consumer complaints have been filed against NH Matcon/Aero Homes (Zirakpur, Punjab) regarding the “Aero Homes” project. Key issues include delays in possession, failure to obtain occupation/completion certificates, and deficiencies in service, leading to legal action before the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and RERA Punjab.  Key Details on NH Matcon Aero Homes Complaints: Issues: Incomplete projects, failure to deliver … Read more

Consumer Case VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Judgment

Consumer Case VS GILLCO DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Judgment

Complaints against Gillco Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. (primarily based in Mohali, Punjab) often relate to delayed possession of projects like “Gillco Palms” and “Gillco Park Hills,” leading to RERA Punjab complaints regarding interest on delayed possession. Many cases have been settled via mutual compromises or RERA orders. Common Complaint Issues Delayed Possession: Buyers have sought … Read more

TDI City Consumer Case for Refund of Amount

TDI City Consumer Case for Refund of Amount

Consumers facing delays in TDI City projects can file cases for refunds due to deficiency in service. Courts frequently order developers to refund the principal amount along with interest (often 9%–15% p.a.), litigation costs, and compensation for mental agony. Key precedents show NCDRC and state commissions strongly favor buyers when possession is delayed. Key Findings & Precedents … Read more

BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT

BEST BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS CONSUMER COMPLAINT

Consumer complaints against Best Zone Builders & Developers (specifically projects like “Orchid Green”) center on failure to deliver possession within the stipulated time, lack of construction progress, and failure to provide required completion certificates. Legal remedies often include consumer court orders for refunds of deposited amounts (e.g., ₹20.49 lakh in one case) with interest, along … Read more

Canam Consultants Consumer Complaint Immigration Case

Canam Consultants Consumer Complaint Immigration Case

Canam Consultants has faced multiple consumer complaints regarding service deficiencies, particularly in immigration and student visa cases, with allegations of non-refunded fees and failure to inform clients about application rejections. Past cases involved claims for refunds of over INR 1 Lakh and compensation. Key Details and Complaint Areas: Common Issues: Complaints often center on negligence in processing … Read more

Consumer Complaint Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd

Consumer Complaint Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd

Consumers have filed complaints against Gillco Developers & Builders Pvt Ltd regarding delayed possession of units in projects like Gillco Valley, Sector 127, prompting legal action through the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Punjab (RERA) and consumer forums. Key issues include delayed construction, failure to deliver possession, and demands for refunds. Several cases have resulted in settlements or orders … Read more

Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case

Sushma Elite Cross Zirakpur Consumer Case

Complaints regarding Sushma Elite Cross in Zirakpur (Dhakoli) primarily involve issues with possession delays, legal disputes regarding construction quality, and poor mobile network connectivity. Cases have been registered with the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Key Complaint Details: Possession Delays: Buyers have faced significant delays in receiving possession of their units, leading to legal action. Quality and Amenities: Some residents have reported concerns … Read more

CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint

CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint

RERA complaints against Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd. can be filed with the Punjab RERA Authority for issues like delayed possession or project delays. Multiple execution cases (e.g., EX/AO/37/2022) indicate active legal proceedings against the developer. Aggrieved buyers, including NRIs, can file complaints online, with orders typically passed within 60 days.

Key Details regarding Chandigarh Overseas RERA Complaints:

  • Common Issues: The primary complaints involve failure to deliver possession, leading to RERA orders for compensation and refunds with interest.
  • Active Cases: Various execution cases (e.g., EX/AO/06/2021, EX/AO/08/2021) have been listed against M/s Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd. with the Adjudicating Officer of RERA Punjab.
  • Company Address: Records indicate the developer has operated from SCO No. 196-197, Top Floor, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh.
  • Action Required: Buyers seeking relief should file a formal complaint online via the Punjab RERA website, attaching all documents related to the booking, payments, and agreement, as outlined in this RERA complaint guide

For specific case updates, check the “Orders & Judgements in Execution” section on the Punjab RERA website.

CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint wherein refund of payment allowed with interest SBI MCLR +2%.

JUDGEMENT SUMMARY of Complaint before RERA Punjab Authority against CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT LTD RERA Complaint

HARISH MINOCHA V. CHANDIGARH OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 7th July, 2020

Today we are going to talk about the case of Harish Minocha v. Chandigarh overseas Pvt. Ltd., 7th July, 2020. The advocate for the complainant side was Ms. Banni Chibbar and for the respondent side was ex- parte.

Read more

Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund

Acme Builders Pvt Ltd Consumer Complaint for Refund

Consumers can file a complaint against Acme Builders Pvt Ltd for refunds due to project delays or deficiency in service by approaching the District/State Consumer Commission or filing through the E-daakhil portal. Previous cases indicate successful refunds with 9–10% interest plus compensation for harassment. Key remedies include filing via National Consumer Helpline or RERA. Steps to File … Read more

GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB

GMADA CONSUMER COMPLAINT STATE COMMISSION PUNJAB

Consumer complaints against GMADA (Greater Mohali Area Development Authority) are handled by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Chandigarh. Common issues involve delayed possession, refund disputes, and interest claims. For grievances, you can contact GMADA at 78886-96869 or visit their office at PUDA Bhawan, Sector-62, SAS Nagar. Key Details for Filing a Complaint … Read more

Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Consumer Complaint

Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Consumer Complaint

Complaints against Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers primarily involve project delays, failure to deliver possession of flats/plots, and misappropriation of funds, leading buyers to file cases in consumer forums and RERA for refunds, interest, and compensation, with several rulings ordering refunds and damages against the developer for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices. Buyers often seek money … Read more

Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd

Refund Consumer Case Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd

Consumer cases against Emerging Valley Pvt Ltd frequently result in orders for a full refund of deposit amounts (ranging from ₹6.97 lakh to ₹24 lakh+) plus 9–12% annual interest and compensation for harassment, driven by failure to deliver property possession, lack of approvals, and project delays. Several cases note the company failed to deliver, leading … Read more

ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Complaint

ALLIED INFRAZONE & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Complaint

Allied Infrazone & Developers Pvt. Ltd., based in Chandigarh, was penalized by a consumer forum for failing to deliver promised flats in their “Premium Homes” project in Lalru on time. Complainants reported incomplete work in 2016-2017, leading to a court-ordered refund of approximately ₹10.80 lakh plus compensation for delays. Key Details Regarding Complaints: Project Involved: “Premium … Read more

SKYRISE BUILDERS VENETIAN TOWER CONSUMER COMPLAINT

SKYRISE BUILDERS VENETIAN TOWER CONSUMER COMPLAINT

Consumer complaints against Skyrise Builders’ Venetian Tower (now Metro Town Promenade) in Zirakpur often involve demands for refunds, interest, and compensation due to inordinate delays in possession, lack of development, and failure to obtain necessary sanctions. Complaints have been filed under RERA for these deficiencies. Key details regarding the complaints: Project Details: Located in Sector 5, Peer … Read more

Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. CONSUMER COMPLAINT

Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. CONSUMER COMPLAINT

Emerging Valley Pvt. Ltd. faces multiple legal complaints regarding non-delivery of plots/apartments, lack of project approvals, and failure to refund investors in Mohali, Punjab. Numerous consumers have filed cases with RERA Punjab and consumer courts, resulting in orders for refunds, interest, and arrest warrants for MD Gurpreet Singh Sidhu. Key details of complaints against Emerging … Read more

TDI Infracorp State Commission Haryana Complaint

TDI Infracorp State Commission Haryana Complaint

Complaints against TDI Infracorp (or TDI Infrastructure Ltd) in Haryana are commonly filed before the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HARERA) Panchkula or the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for issues such as delayed possession, non-registration of deeds, and failure to provide promised amenities, often resulting in orders for refunds, interest payments, or handing over of possession.  Key Details … Read more

RERA Panchkula Case against Omaxe Pvt Ltd

RERA Panchkula Case against Omaxe Pvt Ltd

Several complaints have been registered with the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) Panchkula against Omaxe Ltd. (and its subsidiaries) regarding projects in Haryana, including issues with delayed possession, failure to upload project reports, and demands for refund. Key Details on HRERA Panchkula vs. Omaxe Active Cases & Penalties: HRERA Panchkula has initiated suo-motu proceedings against Omaxe for not uploading quarterly … Read more

Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Haryana RERA Complaint

Suncity Builders Pvt Ltd Haryana RERA Complaint

Complaints against Suncity Builders/Projects Pvt. Ltd. in Haryana RERA often relate to significant delays in possession, unjustified demands for extra charges, and failure to provide amenities, with numerous cases filed regarding projects like Suncity Heights (Rohtak) and various Gurugram developments. Homebuyers can file complaints on the HARERA website to seek possession, interest on delayed payments … Read more

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Complaint for Refund

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Complaint for Refund

Complaints for refunds against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension (Mullanpur, New Chandigarh) are commonly filed with RERA Punjab or the Consumer Commission due to significant delays in possession, with recent rulings (2025-2026) ordering refunds of principal amounts along with interest (approx. 9% p.a.) and compensation for mental agony. Key issues include projects lacking proper Completion Certificates, rendering “fit-out” offers invalid. Key Details for … Read more

Call Us